Re: [HACKERS] qsort again (was Re: [PERFORM] Strange Create Index behaviour)

2006-02-15 Thread Gary Doades
Tom Lane wrote: For some reason I hadn't immediately twigged to the fact that your test script is just N repetitions of the exact same structure with random data. So it's not so surprising that you get random variations in behavior with different test data sets. > It seems clear that our qsort

Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without

2005-03-13 Thread Gary Doades
Tom Lane wrote: Would those of you with access to other DBMSes try this: create table tab (col integer); select 1 from tab having 1=0; select 1 from tab having 1=1; insert into tab values(1); insert into tab values(2); select 1 from tab having 1=0; select 1 from tab having 1=1; I claim that a SQL-c

Re: [HACKERS] libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0

2004-09-18 Thread Gary Doades
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 13:50:43 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Lane) wrote: > >Well, (a) I ran out of time, and (b) I wasn't sure what the most >convenient API would be. Should we create something that packages >together a Parse and a Describe Statement, or expose those as >separate things? > >There'