altix/
>
> 64 CPUs seems scalable enough for me. :-) When can we expect BSD to run
> on this system and use all 64 CPUs efficiently?
>
I think FreeBSD 5.[1|2] will be able to. That was the entire reason for SMPng and
KSE. There is not too much of the kernel left untouched f
to come up with something
proper as abstime is undocumented as far as I can find.
Thanks for the help.
GB
--
GB Clark II | Roaming FreeBSD Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | General Geek
CTHULU for President - Why choose the lesser of two evils?
---
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 16:29:03 -0600
GB Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Well the subject says it all. It was there in the last beta I was testing
> which was beta 1.
>
> Am I being dense here, or is it really missing?
>
> Thanks,
>
> GB
It was
just a little out
of date.
--
GB Clark II | Roaming FreeBSD Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | General Geek
CTHULU for President - Why choose the lesser of two evils?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands
Hello,
Well the subject says it all. It was there in the last beta I was testing
which was beta 1.
Am I being dense here, or is it really missing?
Thanks,
GB
--
GB Clark II | Roaming FreeBSD Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | General Geek
CTHULU for President - Why choose the
orking the way it should
on FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE.
Thanks!
GB
--
GB Clark II | Roaming FreeBSD Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | General Geek
CTHULU for President - Why choose the lesser of two evils?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: sub
rsion
of FreeBSD you have, as is evidenced by the massive breakage right now on current for
alot of ports.
GB
--
GB Clark II | Roaming FreeBSD Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | General Geek
CTHULU for President - Why choose the lesser of two evils?
---(end of
e files that have not been
modified within the set number of days. This amount is variable. You can also
tell clean_tmp to ignore any files you wish. This is all configurable via
rc.conf and friends.
GB
--
GB Clark II| Roaming FreeBSD Admin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | General Geek
