Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, having all my users run contrib/adddepend isn't an
>> option for me. However, that script does contain a good deal of
>> information that I may be able to use for detecting old-style foreign
>> key constraints in my own code.
>
>I assume you
On Thursday 29 March 2001 22:15, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Just looked in heapam.c - I can fix it in two hours.
> > The question is - should we do this now?
>
> This scares the hell out of me.
>
> I do NOT think we should be making quick-hack changes in fundamental
> system semantics at this point of th
On Tuesday 27 March 2001 15:14, Tom Lane wrote:
> Forest Wilkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > session1<< create function nextid( varchar(32)) returns int8 as '
> > session1<< select * from idseq where name = $1::text for update;
> > session1<&
