Re: [HACKERS] two servers on the same port

2008-10-27 Thread Eric Haszlakiewicz
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:21:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Eric Haszlakiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:15:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> What platform is this, anyway? > > I'm running on NetBSD 4. > > > Well, it seem

Re: [HACKERS] two servers on the same port

2008-10-19 Thread Eric Haszlakiewicz
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:15:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Eric Haszlakiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:48:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> That's already documented not to work, and not for any hidden > >> implementation rea

Re: [HACKERS] two servers on the same port

2008-10-19 Thread Eric Haszlakiewicz
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 12:48:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Eric Haszlakiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I just spent a couple of days trying to figure out why I couldn't start > > two servers on the same port, even though I was configuring separate > > li

[HACKERS] two servers on the same port

2008-10-18 Thread Eric Haszlakiewicz
I just spent a couple of days trying to figure out why I couldn't start two servers on the same port, even though I was configuring separate listen_address values. I kept gettting errors about shmget failing with "could not create shared memory segment: Invalid argument". I finally noticed that