Hi,
On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 11:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> So the point is that postgresql-devel now needs to have a dependency
> on icu-devel.
Oh, I see. Ack, added. Will appear in 10.0 RPMs.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Consultant, R
Hi,
On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 08:19 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> probably rpm is created with --with-icu
Sure, I compile all v10 RPMs with ICU support.
Regards
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGun
Hi,
On Sat, 2017-09-02 at 06:52 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> but looks so it is Fedora26 issue - I see these lines elsewhere too.
I cannot reproduce it on my F26 box.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certif
, the -contrib rpm provides those.
> Please advise if my possibly novice question should better be posed
> elsewhere.
Please email pgsql-pkg-...@postgresql.org list for further questions.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consult
now how I will do it? Any docs somewhere?
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
.tex-pdf
(Press Enter to retry, or Control-D to exit)
Please type another input file name:
========
Can someone please take a look?
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
if it's a bug it's not our bug. I've adjusted the test to
> check the following Tuesday, so as to dodge the edge case.
Thanks! Looks like buildfarm is green again.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant,
trip over the problem. The point of the test is mainly to see if the
> [clock] command works at all, not to exercise any specific parameter
> choices. Would you check whether this:
>
> $ tclsh
> % clock format [clock scan "1/26/2010"] -format "%U"
>
> gi
Hi Tom,
On Sun, 2017-02-19 at 10:42 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Relevant question: what version of tcl is installed on those?
8.4.13 is installed.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twit
rds,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
n prepare the buildfarm
instances later Saturday.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
egister them via
buildfarm.pg.org soon.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
r
> PostgreSQL work.
>
> For that reason, as of today, I am stepping down from the PostgreSQL
> Core Team.
This is sad news. Thank you for your great contributions to PostgreSQL, and I
with success in the future!
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Postg
hat. I've seen many cases that we need more than 1000.
Regards,
--
Devrim Gündüz
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
long time in
PGDG RPMs, and did not get any complaints. I'd vote for %m for default.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
r own libicu
there, as a part of EPAS, but I don't know the reasoning/history behind there.)
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
resources than the prod
machine. What could cause this problem that has more maintenance_work_mem and
shared_buffers than staging one?
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @D
commands.
This is PostgreSQL 9.5.4 on CentOS 6.8, fully up2date, and they are using the
community RPMs.
Any ideas what is causing this crash?
Please let me know if you need more data.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Cer
also have "pg_logical", that includes a "log" keyword already...
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
> pgdg-redhat96-9.6-1.noarch.rpm.
This is *not* PostgreSQL version -- this is the repository RPM only.
> 2) Should beta2 built only from source ? If the RPM is beta 1 why is the
> server version reporting as beta2 ?
See above.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @
Hi,
That is the version of *repo* RPM, not PostgreSQL itself.Once you install it,
you can grab the latest version with
yum install postgresql92-server
Regards, Devrim
On January 15, 2016 7:48:53 PM GMT+02:00, Robert Haas
wrote:
>> Hmm I just wanted to get the rpm for the latest 9.2 release
s years ago, I was releasing Alpha
RPMs for many platforms. I'll do it again if we keep doing it.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduz
packages or not,
though, to fix this issue.
May I ask you to subscribe pgsql-pkg-...@postgresql.org if you want to
discuss more?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitte
Hi,
Anyone? :)
Regards, Devrim
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 15:19 +0200, Devrim Gündüz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Background info first: PL/Ruby was originally maintained by Guy Decoux,
> who passed away in 2008: https://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/166658 . After
> his death, Akinori MUSHA forked
g.
I want to remind that I am not a Ruby guy, so this is really a community
stuff for me.
Thanks by now.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @Devr
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 15:53 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I ended up splitting the paragraph in two in order to get the PDFs to
> build. I've applied a patch for this to 9.0 only so we can keep
> building PDFs.
Thanks for looking at this -- you saved my time.
Regards,
--
ut Christoph already started the server (successfully) with port
5494, so the pg_reload_conf() should ignore it in the next attempt.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @
Hi,
Will there be a pg_filedump for 9.4? I'd like to finish package tests
before we release 9.4.0.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimG
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 09:41 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> The only thing I can think of offhand that would require it is
> pgbouncer.
Yeah. Recent pgbouncer versions require libevent 2.0+, and RHEL 6 has
1.4.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB
Hi,
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 10:57 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> BTW, what about also renaming pg_llog directory? I'm afraid that
> a user can confuse pg_log with pg_llog.
+1. I hit this while testing 9.4 this week. Should be confusing for many
end-users.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜ
ne) I
> get errors from other packages:
>
> Package python-psycopg2-2.5.2-1.f19.x86_64.rpm is not signed
>
> Something wrong with the packages?
I thought I fixed that -- but apparently not. Please run
yum clean metadata
and try updating the package again.
Regards,
--
Devrim
s email do not belong to -hackers. You don't need to
cross-post here)
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
signature.asc
Des
/postgresql/F-19/postgresql-9.3.service
is an example of what we use in the RPMs. (if website fails, please just
reload)
Attached is a modified version that will work with the compile defaults.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
eb: http://www.postgresql-support.de
> http://www.postgresql.at/
>
>
>
>--
>Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
>To make changes to your subscription:
>http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
--
Devrim Gündüz
Hi,
On Mon, 2013-01-21 at 11:33 +0530, Vivek Singh Raghuwanshi wrote:
> But i am trying to achieve this via multiple if conditions , can you
> send me your redhat and suse spec files.
As I have emailed you before, spec files,etc. are at
http://svn.pgrpms.org/repo
Regards,
--
Devrim
d its derivatives (RHEL,
SL, CentOS) separately.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitt
the upgrade, they now can't use the
> script. I assume users would have PGPORT set before running the
> script, no?
They can't use the script in each way -- at least we can make it usable
for one case, I think.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB:
u'll need to drop it completely to recover.
What is the difference between REINDEX and dropping and recreating
index? (or say, creating the same index with another name, dropping old
one, and renaming the new one with old one?)
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ E
prefix
to vacuumdb command in the same script?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter
Hi,
On Wed, 2012-05-30 at 22:03 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> A control variable was added in this commit:
>
> commit db84ba65ab5c0ad0b34d68ab5a687bc5f4ca3ba6
> Author: Peter Eisentraut
Thanks Bruce, apparently I missed it.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Syst
gt; Yes, there were significantly more votes for reverting this than
> keeping it. So we at least need to have a setting.
Can we do something about this before beta2 is bundled? I would like it
to be reverted though, rather than having a setting.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems E
-- and the new event submission policy on postgresql.org raised a
barrier against adding an item to the website, but that is more a -www
topic.
(Oh, and you need to have the secret key to enter the meeting.)
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Postg
Hi,
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 21:17 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We release the alpha with no packaging.
I have released RPMs regularly for all alphas before, at least over the
last 2 years or so.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.
.
(As a side note, RPMs *may not* be ready, because I (and Magnus) will be
at PGDay Turkey on 12th, and will be busy over the whole weekend).
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified
retty much we need actually, I think. Did
not test the patch, but the feature should be in core/contrib/whatever.
This will also increase performance for the static tables that needs to
be in the buffers all the time. I'm also seeing some use cases for BI
databases.
Thanks!
Rega
Fixed, but please report it to pgsql-www next time.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 21:12 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> The point is that all the packaging will be done *before* people leave
> to go eat Turkey.
Eating me?
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, R
the big O in the g-spot.
>
http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2011/10/index-only-scans-weve-got-em.html
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 18:28 +0200, Daniel Vázquez wrote:
> Can Global Development Group, make some acumulative rpm for contrib
> modules that are backward compatible???
No (as the RPM maintainer).
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprise
ify a final release version for 8.2? This set will be
8.2.21, and I propose to EOL 8.2 as of 8.2.22.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 16:49 +0300, Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
> Is there a plan to wrap up 9.2 Alpha 1 before the next commitfest?
<...>
Ok, so if noone is willing to produce alpha's (which is sad), we need to
change the text in here:
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/alpha
--
terested in packaging until the last
commitfest?
We need people to start testing features, without having to use git or
such.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreS
Hi,
Is there a plan to wrap up 9.2 Alpha 1 before the next commitfest?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 14:00 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Are we going with beta4 or rc1?
RC1:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/19869.1312298...@sss.pgh.pa.us
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consult
over, it provides a little incentive for other companies that
> might also be in a position to fund development but lack the "peer
> approval" of the idea, or a final little push.
>
> So what's the general opinion here?
+1 for adding sponsor name to the commit message. I
through
pgtranslation project.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.co
users don't get the flexibility that they
> otherwise would have.
These types of stuff goes under pgfoundry, for now.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~Postgr
nd not aware that it has the
same standards that contrib/ has.
PGXN cannot replace contrib. It can only be an add-on to contrib.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community:
change in next build set.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.c
hat 9.0 it's still in the same place:
>
> $ rpm -qf /usr/pgsql-9.0/bin/pg_config
> postgresql90-devel-9.0.2-2PGDG.rhel5
I'm not sure that I can move it to main package in 9.0 package set, I
need to make sure that I won't break anything. But it is pretty doab
as getting another message before)
This is 9.1's psql connecting to 9.1's server. For some reason, psql
uses 9.0 client libs, so if I export LD_LIBRARY_PATH, everything works:
$ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/pgsql-9.1/lib psql
...
Could it be the same thing?
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems E
testing 9.1 psql with a 9.0 libpq (perhaps due to an rpath issue)
> then 9.0 libpq would spit up on client_encoding, which wasn't a legal
> connection parameter in 9.0.
Bingo:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/pgsql-9.1/lib/ psql -p 5433
worked. Let me fix the rpms.
Regards,
--
Devrim
I'm getting the following message after upgrading to Alpha5 on my Fedora
14 box:
$ psql -p 5433
psql: connection pointer is NULL
which comes from libpq. Server is running, and I can connect it to via
9.0's psql.
This is a regular RPM build. Am I doing something wrong, or?
Regards,
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 15:53 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> To be honest, I'm mostly just reporting what I've heard Greg Smith say
> on this topic. I don't have any machine with that kind of RAM.
I thought we had a machine for hackers who want to do performance
testing.
hat he will setup a web page for this, and let the list
know.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.
everal days away from being
> noticeably less broken than they were in alpha4. I have mixed
> feelings
> about whether an alpha5 right now is useful.
Fair enough. Looks like we will skip next week, too.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.e
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 11:40 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> My vote would be forget about building installers for alpha4 and
> instead wrap an alpha5 next week.
If you need more votes for this: +1 from me. I'd like to wrap the
packages before I leave for PGEast.
Regards,
--
De
so please contact me *before* Friday.
Please count me in as a mentor for a GUI project. It is an open source
dashboard for PostgreSQL DBAs, called ADJ Dashboard.
Erdinc (I CC'ed him) is/will be working on the project.
This is my first touch with GSoC, please let me know if I'm missin
to support any parameters
> (with validation, of course), but that's a much bigger thing. Just
> removing the (undocumented, btw) special case would make things more
> consistent.
>
> Thoughts?
RPMs don't need it anymore, so +1 for removing.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Prin
including syncrep
ones.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devri
fore PGEast, please -- I will be there, and won't be
able to spend time on packaging.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
Err, please try putting an extra char before the first comment line,
like:
w# PostgreSQL Client Authentication Configuration File
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gundu
ou're using one of those
> configurations where early output to stderr goes to /dev/null?
I tried to start postmaster with:
* pg_ctl -D data start
* postmaster -D data
* pg_ctl -D data -l logfile start
None of them logged anything to anywhere. You can reproduce it on your
machine, too
(startup) log file and mention about
the syntax error in hba file?
(FWIW, I saw the same issue in a Greenplum 4.0.3 instance 2 months
before or so.)
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim
t while
creating big indexes on a machine which had enough ram.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 13:52 +0100, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> "Consider providing debian packages at debian.postgresql.org"
apt.postgresql.org, please. :)
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Comm
t
seen any issues with that. It is just a wrapper, nothing else...
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: h
IIRC we announced that we will EOL 8.1 in 2010 -- given that we are now
in December, will it be done soon?
(As a packager, I'll be happy to drop is ASAP, so that I can use those
VMs for new OSes).
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Postg
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 09:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I think docdir is separate from the regular prefix. Try specifying
> --docdir to configure.
Thanks, I'll test (not now, but soon).
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 13:30 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> What does "pg_config --docdir" report?
$ /usr/pgsql-9.0/bin/pg_config --docdir
/usr/share/doc/pgsql
I was expecting it to be somewhere in /usr/pgsql-9.0, where it is the
--prefix. Am I wrong?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Postgre
d to fool with MODULEDIR. See
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-01/msg00025.php
Has anyone used this successfully? It did not work for me, and I'm
hacking spec files in order to install docs under somewhere else.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red
I can give it a try while building RPMs.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
signat
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 23:46 +0900, Tomoaki Sato wrote:
>
> I try to install pgAdmin III using Yum on CentOS 5.5 (x86_64), but it
> seems pgadmin3_90 package architecture is i386 in Yum repository.
There was a build problem on 64-bit build on RHEL5, so I pushed 32-bit
version.
--
Devr
onf files during upgrades.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
signature.asc
Descrip
Attached is a small patch that adds a few comments for the settings that
require restart. Applicable for 9.0+.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz
under /usr/pgsql-9.0/share/contrib for 9.0. How do I do that?
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http
On Sat, 2010-09-18 at 18:01 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> who is psycopg maintainer, please?
Why don't you ask it to psycopg2 mailing list?
http://www.initd.org/ (I know, mailing lists are down nowadays. See
website)
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified
uild 9.1 alpha1 RPMs before we release 9.0, so that I can
test parallel installation with RPMs.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www
20.Ağu.2010 tarihinde 23:03 saatinde, Josh Berkus
şunları yazdı:
The betas are pre-.0. Maybe we should have 9.0.(-3) instead. Or
8.9.97?
;-)
This is pretty much what Fedora does actually :-)
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL DBA @ Akinon/Markafoni, Red Hat Certified Engineer
devrim
. Remember why we
jumped from 7.5 to 8.0 or from 8.5 to 9.0.
Cheers,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL DBA @ Akinon/Markafoni, Red Hat Certified Engineer
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
--
Sent via pgsql
+1 for Tom's post.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL DBA @ Akinon/Markafoni, Red Hat Certified Engineer
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz
20.Ağu.2010 tarihinde 21:40 saatinde, Tom Lane
şunları
04.Ağu.2010 tarihinde 22:44 saatinde, Josh Berkus
şunları yazdı:
I'm OK with forcing an initDB for RC1.
I think beta5 will be a better choice than RC 1 here.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL DBA @ Akinon/Markafoni, Red Hat Certified Engineer
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQ
separate xlogs for each database, which
speeds ups recovery in case of a crash. It also would increase
performance, since we could write xlogs to separate disks.
Is that doable for PostgreSQL, too?
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 19:56 +0800, Pr, Solaiyappan (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
wrote:
> Also, is there any synchronous replication patch planned for the
> PostgreSQL 9.0 version?
Cybertec announced new version of Cybercluster, which includes sync
replication -- I haven't tested it though.
dn't have any EDB AS code in it.
Agreed.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgund
rade.html
This includes some references to EDB AS, which should be removed from
PostgreSQL official documentation, IMHO.
Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository: http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devr
patch.
> However, I don't seem to see the RPM scripts in the source tree!
> Do they live somewhere else?
>
> Please reply by email, as I haven't subscribed to this list.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jamie Strachan
>
>
>
>
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL D
r
> copy of the PG sources.
The only times that I see this issue over the last years is when I build
PostgreSQL RPMs in the xen-based virtual machines. It is rare, and it
happens when there are 10+ parallel builds.
...I'm pretty sure that it is related to the available resources durin
t; That would be good enough for Saturday; we're going to test it after
> all. Let me know which snapshot day you grab, so we can have the same
> snapshot-day for Windows and other platforms.
FWIW, I can release RPMs based on the same snapshot in an hour after I
get the tarball.
--
De
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 08:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> It would be a good idea to submit this upstream at the snowball
> project, else it might get lost in future updates.
Ok, will do.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
