Is it feasible to add the ability to catch exceptions from COPY?
Darren
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
Darren Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
This might seem sillly, but...
...are comments going to be considered statements for the purpose of
this knob?
(hoping the anwer is "yes")
Are you trying to say we should forbid comments? No thank you.
No.
This might seem sillly, but...
...are comments going to be considered statements for the purpose of
this knob?
(hoping the anwer is "yes")
Darren
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgs
**Andrew Sullivan wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 06:33:07PM +0200, PFC wrote:
> But it's true that preventing multi-statements adds a layer of
> idiot-proofness... a rather thin layer...
As I already said in a previous remark in this thread, I don't really
like partial security solutions.
W
