Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Quinn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> The WAL log uses per-record CRCs plus sequence numbers (both per-record
> and per-page) as a way of determining where valid information stops.
> I don't see any need for relying on a "root
Hello,
I've been wondering how pgsql goes about guaranteeing data
integrity in the face of soft failures. In particular
whether it uses an alternative to the double root block
technique - which is writing, as a final indication of the
validity of new log records, to alternate disk blocks at
