On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pushed with that change and some other mostly-cosmetic tweaking.
Thank you for addressing all those issues, Tom! I tested some
exclusion constraints that are interesting to me, and everything seems
to be working well.
-- Chris
--
Sent via pgs
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> What I would suggest is that you forget the union hack and just use
> memcmp in all the comparison functions. It's not likely to be worth
> the trouble to try to get those calls to be safely aligned. The
> only place where you need go to any t
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
typedef struct
> {
> ! char token[TOKMAXLEN + 1]; /* now always null-terminated */
> char type;
> ! int32 value;
> } datetkn;
Being entirely new to this code, "now" makes me think of the "current
timestamp". I think this word can be remove
