> On tis, 2011-08-16 at 16:17 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Well, I got this on a win64 build. It's *supposed* to have ipv6. I
> > wonder if it breaks on windows just because there is no ipv6 address
> > on the machine...
>
> It would mean that getaddrinfo() of "::1" failed. That seems weird.
> On 02/17/2011 12:34 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >>
> >> On 02/17/2011 12:13 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> FWIW, the only interactively usable version of psql for windows I know
> of is the one that runs under Cygwin. It can be build with readline and
> works a
> charles.mcdev...@emc.com wrote:
> > The GNU people will never be 100% satisfied by anything you do to psql,
> > other
> than making it GPL.
> > Readline is specifically licensed in a way to try to force this (but many
> > disagree
> with their ability to force this).
> >
>
> The "GNU people" a
> -Original Message-
> From: gsst...@gmail.com [mailto:gsst...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Greg Stark
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 4:14 PM
> To: McDevitt, Charles
> Cc: sfr...@snowman.net; alvhe...@commandprompt.com;
> g...@2ndquadrant.com; mba...@debian.org; t...@sss.pgh.pa.us;
> and...@d
-Original Message-
> From: gsst...@gmail.com [mailto:gsst...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Greg Stark
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2011 4:03 PM
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:06 PM, wrote:
> > The GNU people will never be 100% satisfied by anything you do to psql,
> > other
> than making it GPL
> * charles.mcdev...@emc.com (charles.mcdev...@emc.com) wrote:
> > Don't forget that OpenSSL has a FIPS-140 compliant version, and FIPS-140
> compliance is essential to many Federal users.
>
> Essential? That's a bit much. Yes, it shows up on a FISMA review as an
> open action item, but it's a r
If psql uses libreadline and libgnutls, does that mean psql will be distributed
under the GPL in the future? Or Dual-licensed?
If I read the readline license right, applications that link to it must be GPL.
That's why we (EMC/Greenplum) switch to libedit, even though readline is
nicer... We di
Don't forget that OpenSSL has a FIPS-140 compliant version, and FIPS-140
compliance is essential to many Federal users.
GnuTLS doesn't qualify.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-
> > And so does:
> > SELECT 1.23e+01::Integer
> >
> >
> >> > which I find just as dangerous as
> >> > SELECT '1.234e+01'::Integer;
> >
> > Add quotes to either of the other two, and then they don't work either.
>
> Well, that's stupidly arbitrary. If we're not going to accept
> '1.234e+01'::Integ
