Revisiting my original post:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg00318.php
The "Web SQL" spec is still in its abandoned state.
Mozilla has stated that they do not want to support the API,
though they do allow extensions to send calls to sqlite directly.
Many posters respondin
On 11/8/2010 4:47 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Charles Pritchard's message of lun nov 08 20:25:21 -0300 2010:
On 11/8/2010 3:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Kevin Grittner's message of lun nov 08 19:30:54 -0300 2010:
David Fetter wrote:
That's not proof against a DoS
On 11/8/2010 7:55 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Charles Pritchard's message of sáb nov 06 23:20:13 -0300 2010:
Simple async sql sub-set (the spec in trouble):
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webdatabase/
This is insane. This spec allows the server to run arbitrary SQL
commands on the client
Hey All,
I just noticed that an editor at the w3c seems to have hit a wall with
browser implementers,
as they are all using Sqlite as their backend database, and so there is
no second, independent implementation. (required for the standards process).
At some point, these specs will be used mor
On 8/15/10 8:47 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 08/15/2010 11:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Charles Pritchard writes:
I'd originally sent this to Joseph Adams, as he has been working on
adding a JSON datatype.
I've suggested supporting BSON, as there are many client
implementations
availabl
On 8/16/10 8:40 AM, Christopher Browne wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan writes:
If BSON is simply in effect an efficient encoding of JSON, then it's not
clear to me that we would wa
0 11:27 AM, Joseph Adams wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
Hello,
I saw that you've submitted a patch to add JSON support to PostgreSQL.
Thought I'd mention that BSON is gradually picking up in popularity,
and does have a good amount of cross-client
