Re: [HACKERS] Postgres service stops when I kill client backend on Windows

2015-10-09 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hello Dmitry > -Original Message- > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Dmitry Vasilyev > Sent: Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015 11:52 > To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: [HACKERS] Postgres service stops when I kill client

Re: [HACKERS] Odd query execution behavior with extended protocol

2015-10-03 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hello > Npgsql supports sending multiple SQL statements in a single packet via the > extended protocol. This works fine, but when the second query SELECTs a value > modified by the first's UPDATE, I'm getting a result as if the > UPDATE hasn't yet occurred. Looks like the first updating statem

Re: [HACKERS] unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK

2015-09-28 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
I had not seen this. > -Original Message- > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas > Sent: Montag, 28. September 2015 21:43 > To: Stephen Frost > Cc: Peter Eisentraut ; pgsql-hackers > ;

Re: [HACKERS] unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK

2015-09-28 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Good morning > -Original Message- > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Frost > Sent: Montag, 28. September 2015 21:16 > To: Peter Eisentraut ; Robert Haas > Cc: pgsql-hackers ; Charles Clavadets

Re: [HACKERS] unclear about row-level security USING vs. CHECK

2015-09-22 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hello Peter > I'm testing the new row-level security feature. I'm not clear on the > difference between the USING and CHECK clauses in the CREATE POLICY > statement. > > The documentation says: > > """ > A policy grants the ability to SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, or DELETE rows > which match the rel

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

2015-09-15 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hi Stephen > On 15.09.2015, at 17:13, Stephen Frost wrote: > > Charles, > > * Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetsc...@swisspug.org) wrote: >> Yes, that helped a lot! In the attachment now a single patch file >> with all changes. > > I've pushed this fix

Re: [HACKERS] Attach comments to functions' parameters and return value

2015-09-15 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hello Jim > -Original Message- > From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers- > ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Charles Clavadetscher > Sent: Dienstag, 15. September 2015 07:35 > To: Jim Nasby ; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS]

Re: [HACKERS] Attach comments to functions' parameters and return value

2015-09-14 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hello Àlvaro On 14/09/2015 20:02, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Jim Nasby wrote: On 9/14/15 8:59 AM, Charles Clavadetscher wrote: To long time PostgreSQL developers this may look straightforward. For the moment I am not even sure if that is correct and if there are other places that would need

Re: [HACKERS] Attach comments to functions' parameters and return value

2015-09-14 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hello Jim On 14/09/2015 19:23, Jim Nasby wrote: On 9/14/15 8:59 AM, Charles Clavadetscher wrote: Hello In PostgreSQL it is possible to attach comments to almost everything. This made it possible for us to integrate the wiki that we use for our technical documentation directly with the

[HACKERS] Attach comments to functions' parameters and return value

2015-09-14 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hello In PostgreSQL it is possible to attach comments to almost everything. This made it possible for us to integrate the wiki that we use for our technical documentation directly with the database using the MediaWiki [1] extensions ExternalData [2] and MagicNoCache [3]. The result is a documentat

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

2015-09-13 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hi Stephen On 13/09/2015 16:56, Stephen Frost wrote: Charles, * Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetsc...@swisspug.org) wrote: I noticed that the position of the parameter "policy_name" in the description list of parameters was not at the (alphabetically) correct position. I changed th

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

2015-09-13 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Stephen On 13/09/2015 15:26, Charles Clavadetscher wrote: Hello Stephen On 13/09/2015 14:49, Stephen Frost wrote: Charles, Just FYI, on these lists, we'd prefer it if you wouldn't top-post. * Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetsc...@swisspug.org) wrote: Yes, of course. I will take ca

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

2015-09-13 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
Hello Stephen On 13/09/2015 14:49, Stephen Frost wrote: Charles, Just FYI, on these lists, we'd prefer it if you wouldn't top-post. * Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetsc...@swisspug.org) wrote: Yes, of course. I will take care of that and send a new patch. Thanks! Who will then g

Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

2015-09-13 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
hen Frost > Sent: Sonntag, 13. September 2015 14:31 > To: Charles Clavadetscher > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY > > Charles, > > * Charles Clavadetscher (clavadetsc...@swisspug.org) wrote: > > Well I gave it a

[HACKERS] [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY

2015-09-12 Thread Charles Clavadetscher
helps. Regards Charles -Original Message- From: pgsql-docs-ow...@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-docs-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Charles Clavadetscher Sent: Sonntag, 13. September 2015 07:36 To: pgsql-d...@postgresql.org Subject: [DOCS] Missing COMMENT ON POLICY Hello Lately I am