"Lauri Pietarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Anthony W. Youngman
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> > But it does seem strange indexing on a composite field
> >like that ...
> >
> But why does it seem
"Christopher Browne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Anthony W. Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marshall Spight
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >>Unless one has data independence, one does not have
> >>this option; one will be
"Lauri Pietarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lauri Pietarinen >[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >
> >>Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> >>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lauri Pietarinen
> >>><[EMAIL PROTE
"Lauri Pietarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lauri Pietarinen
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >
> >
> >>>Okay. Give me a FORMULA that returns a time in seconds for your query.
> >>>
> >>>Let's assume
"Lauri Pietarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lauri Pietarinen
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >
> >
> >>So in your opinion, is the problem
> >>
> >>1) SQL is so hard that the average programmer will
"Lauri Pietarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bob Badour wrote:
>
> >"Lauri Pietarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>I could now denormalise OrderD
"Marshall Spight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Bob Badour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > All physical structures will bias performance for some operations and
> > against o
"Lauri Pietarinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
>
> >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lauri Pietarinen
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >
> >
> >>Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Fine. But MV *doesn't* *need* much of a cache.
obody seems to have been prepared to explain the MV model in adequate
> theoretical terms as to allow the gentle readers to compare the theory
> behind it with the other theories out there.
>
> I'm afraid that does not reflect very well on either those lauding MV
> or those trashi
"Dawn M. Wolthuis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Thank you, Seun, for asking your question with a bit of logic and not
> gut-reaction emotional baggage (and for also asking a question of me
> off-list so I could ramble). I'll try to make this more suscinct.
With al
"Mike Preece" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dawn M. Wolthuis) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Bob Badour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>
With all due respect, Dawn, you are an idiot.
"Dawn M. Wolthuis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Good question. Although I would want to move away from relational
> databases too, if there is an RDBMS and one wants to query it, what
> would I aim for? If you look at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Dann Corbit") wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Seun Osewa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 11:52 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL
> >
> >
> > Hi,
"Anthony W. Youngman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lee Fesperman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
> >If you don't care for mathematical principles, there's always ad-hoc database
> >models.
> >Check out Pick, OO and XML databases.
14 matches
Mail list logo
