Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password

2017-04-26 Thread Ashesh Vashi
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Ashesh Vashi > wrote: > > - Do we need to provide the method here? > > We have connection object itself, it can decide from the type of > connection, > > which method to be use

Re: [HACKERS] scram and \password

2017-04-26 Thread Ashesh Vashi
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 04/22/2017 01:20 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Heikki Linnakangas >> wrote: >> >>> I'll continue reviewing the rest of the patch on Monday, but one glaring >>> issue is that we cannot add an argume

Re: [HACKERS] Missing plpgsql.o Symbols on OS X

2014-08-27 Thread Ashesh Vashi
Please add -arch x86_64 to your LD_FLAGS and CFLAGS in your make file. -- Thanks & Regards, Ashesh Vashi EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company <http://www.enterprisedb.com> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi* <http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi> On Wed,

Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat directory and pg_stat_statements

2014-05-28 Thread Ashesh Vashi
; statistics to disk in the pg_stat directory before we branch off 9.4. > As you mentioned, it's harmless. > K. I was just curious about the scenario. If it was discarding the stats files that originated in earlier version, It should be ok. -- Thanks & Regards, Ashesh Vashi > > -- > Peter Geoghegan >

Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat directory and pg_stat_statements

2014-05-28 Thread Ashesh Vashi
lem is that the > >> pg_stat_statements > >> stats which were collected in past would disappear. OTOH, the server > can keep > >> running successfully from then and no critical data will not > >> disappear. Therefore > >> I think we can commit

Re: [HACKERS] narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

2014-02-02 Thread Ashesh Vashi
roduce > their DEF files; that'll have to wait until after I've got the > row-security work sorted out. > > -- > Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services > > > -- > Sent via

Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Compiling PostgreSQL using ActiveState Python 3.2

2011-08-18 Thread Ashesh Vashi
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On tor, 2011-08-18 at 14:51 +0530, Ashesh Vashi wrote: > > Please ignore the previous patch. > > Please find the updated patch. > > Committed more or less like that. > Thanks > > In passing I also fi

Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Compiling PostgreSQL using ActiveState Python 3.2

2011-08-18 Thread Ashesh Vashi
Please ignore the previous patch. Please find the updated patch. -- Thanks & Regards, Ashesh Vashi EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi> On Thu, Aug 1

Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Compiling PostgreSQL using ActiveState Python 3.2

2011-08-18 Thread Ashesh Vashi
onfig_vars('Py_ENABLE_SHARED'))" Which returns in this case '0'. And, getting values for the 'python_ldlibrary' and 'python_so' are 'libpython3.2m.a' and '.cpython-32m.so' respectively. So, the condition - *x"${python_ldlibrary}&qu

[HACKERS] PATCH: Compiling PostgreSQL using ActiveState Python 3.2

2011-08-17 Thread Ashesh Vashi
'. 2. 'plpython' is trying get linked using '-lpython${*python_version*}', but it should be '-lpython${*python_ldversion*}'. Please find the attached patch, which resolve the issue on my side. -- Thanks & Regards, Ashesh Vashi EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise Po

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Core Team

2011-04-27 Thread Ashesh Vashi
Congrats Magnus!!! Thanks for the smart work and keep it up... -- Thanks & Regards, Ashesh Vashi EnterpriseDB INDIA: Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<http://www.enterprisedb.com> *http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi*<http://www.linkedin.com/in/asheshvashi> On Thu, Apr 28,