> Excerpts from Aron's message of mar jul 26 04:18:55 -0400 2011:
>> Here's another small change to the patch, it works fine for me and it quite
>> saved my day.
>>
>> I try to submit the patch by email.
>
> There's a problem with this patch: long lines are being wrapped by
> your email client, w
ansaction_limit)
break;
The variable "deleted" is only incremented if a lo_unlink was successful, so my
patch only introduces a negligible overhead but no actual change in behavior.
I'm very grateful for your patch and I think it should be accepted as soon as
p
Hi Tim,
you correctly assumed I was just trying to clean up the code. There was no
reason to change the behavior, so please ignore my change to the patch.
Aron
On 26.07.2011, at 15:44, Tim Lewis wrote:
> Hi Aron,
>
> Thanks for the input. The "small change" you sugge
Here's another small change to the patch, it works fine for me and it quite
saved my day.
I try to submit the patch by email.
diff --git a/contrib/vacuumlo/vacuumlo.c b/contrib/vacuumlo/vacuumlo.c
index f6e2a28..1f88d72 100644
--- a/contrib/vacuumlo/vacuumlo.c
+++ b/contrib/vacuumlo/vacuumlo.c
@
