On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 17:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Allan Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Alright, I see why the checks are still needed. The unique index should
> > be on relname, conname right? Also looking into DROP CONSTRAINT's code,
> > it gives a notice
On Thu, 2005-09-01 at 17:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Allan Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've been looking through the code from CommentConstraint
> > and ATExecDropConstraint and they error out on duplicate constraint
> > names for a relation. However,
n. However, ADD CONSTRAINT's code checks for
duplicates and errors out, so would the stuff in comment/drop be useless
checks then? And I would not have to worry about duplicate constraint
names for my rename code?
Allan Wang
---(end of broadcast)
