On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Marc Munro wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-02 at 00:10 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Marc Munro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Consider a table C containing 2 child records C1 and C2, of parent P.
> > > If transaction T1 updates C1 and C2, the locking order of the the
> > > records w
On 9 Aug 2002, Scott Shattuck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We recently put up a new 7.2.1 installation on Solaris 8 that serves a
> 24x7 e-commerce site. The system seems to run pretty well most of the
> time but we see a consistent form of performance anomaly.
>
> Watching pg_stat_activity the system spen
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > I think the existing scheme of generating the plan during first use
> > > in a particular backend is fine. At least as long as we're sticking
> > > with standard plans at all ... IIRC
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joel Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> This will allow you to run a single postgres in a single jail only one
> >> user would have access to it. If you try to run more then one it will
> >> try to use the same shared memory and crash.
>
> > Is this,
