Hello,
At Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:10:35 +0900, Etsuro Fujita
wrote in <552c852b.2050...@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> On 2015/04/13 23:25, Jim Nasby wrote:
> > On 4/13/15 4:58 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> >> On 2015/04/10 21:40, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> >>> On 2015/04/09 12:07, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> I'll updat
Hanada-san,
> Thanks for further review, but I found two bugs in v10 patch.
> I’ve fixed them and wrapped up v11 patch here.
>
> * Fix bug about illegal column order
>
> Scan against a base relation returns columns in order of column definition,
> but
> its target list might require different o
Robert,
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > > Clearly, further testing and documentation is required and I'll be
> > > getting to that over the next couple of days, but it's pretty
On 2015/04/13 23:25, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 4/13/15 4:58 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> On 2015/04/10 21:40, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> On 2015/04/09 12:07, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
I'll update the patch, which will contain only an infrastructure for
this in the PG core, and will not contain any po
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Care to name some? This is certainly quite cumbersome to exploit, but it's
> doable.
>
> We've talked a lot about covert channels and timing attacks on RLS, but this
> makes me more worried because you can attack passwords stored in pg_a
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Applied, thanks!
Thanks. Now, for Windows...
--
Michael
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On 04/02/2015 04:56 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Michael Paquier
wrote:
While looking at that I noticed two additional issues:
- In remote mode, the connection string to the promoted standby was
incorrect when running pg_rewind, leading to connection errors
- At
On 04/10/2015 04:01 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Do these tests work in VPATH builds? I now get a failure in "make
check-world" (both with and without Michael's patch). "make check" in
src/bin/pg_rewind dies with the output below. If I change "./pg_rewind"
to "pg_rewind", tests pass, but I wonder
On 04/01/2015 07:12 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:26:34PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 12/19/2014 02:55 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
I'm thinking that we should add a step to promotion, where we scan
pg_xlog for any segments higher than the timeline switch point, a
On 4/13/15 4:58 AM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On 2015/04/10 21:40, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> On 2015/04/09 12:07, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>> I'll update the patch, which will contain only an infrastructure for
>>> this in the PG core, and will not contain any postgres_fdw change.
>>
>> I updated the patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/04/15 05:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Ian Stakenvicius writes:
>> Hey all -- so I know that Gentoo Linux is likely the only
>> platform this bug occurs under, but i got annoyed enough with it
>> that I decided to write a patch to fix this issue on
* Heikki Linnakangas (hlinn...@iki.fi) wrote:
> On 04/10/2015 05:17 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> >On Apr 9, 2015, at 8:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >>What should we do about this?
> >
> >I bet that there are at least 1000 covert channel attacks that are more
> >practically exploitable than this
David G. Johnston wrote:
> Can we create a "fake" CF time period into which all of these "waiting on
> author" entries can be placed and readily browsed/found instead of leaving
> them in whatever CF they happened to stall in?
This seems a good idea to me -- not a "fake CF", but a page listing al
On 03/26/2015 09:45 PM, Arthur Silva wrote:
On Mar 26, 2015 4:20 AM, "Vladimir Borodin" wrote:
26 марта 2015 г., в 7:32, Michael Paquier
написал(а):
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Venkata Balaji N
wrote:
If the master is crashed or killed abruptly, it may not be possible to
do a
On 2015/04/10 21:40, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> On 2015/04/09 12:07, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>> I'll update the patch, which will contain only an infrastructure for
>> this in the PG core, and will not contain any postgres_fdw change.
>
> I updated the patch based on your comments. Updated patch attache
15 matches
Mail list logo
