Hello
In Czech Postgres mailing list was user request for serialization to json
without null values.
He needs a similar behave like XMLFOREST has - it ignores NULLs
In some situations and conversions, when your table is +/- sparse matrix,
this request is valid
postgres=# select hstore(omega) fr
On 14.5.2014 15:17, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-05-14 15:08:08 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 14 Květen 2014, 13:51, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> On 2014-05-13 20:42:16 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
Can someone please approve the animals I've requested a few days ago?
I'm already running th
On 13.5.2014 20:58, Tom Lane wrote:
> Tomas Vondra writes:
>> Yeah, not really what we were shooting for. I've fixed this by
>> defining the missing locales, and indeed - magpie now fails in
>> plpython tests.
>
> I saw that earlier today (tho right now the buildfarm server seems
> to not be res
Jim Nasby writes:
> On 5/24/14, 8:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps it'd be wise to have a safety check to disallow turning off
>> datallowconn for the last connectable database? Although it couldn't be
>> bulletproof due to race conditions, so maybe that'd just be nannyism.
> BTW, I think the r
Jim Nasby writes:
> Let me ask a related question: is there any reason why we don't accept
> argument names or the default specifier in the regprocedure cast?
regprocedure_in does not contain a full SQL parser, which it would pretty
much need in order to deal with default expressions. Argument
On 5/6/14, 1:57 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 5/5/14, 4:09 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
They do not accept DEFAULT though:
GRANT EXECUTE ON FUNCTION test(t text DEFAULT '') to public;
ERROR: syntax error at or near "DEFAULT"
LINE 1: GRANT EXECUTE ON FUNCTION test(t text DEFAULT '') to public;
Presum
On 5/16/14, 8:15 AM, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
On 20 Feb 2014, at 01:38, Tom Lane wrote:
I am really dubious that letting DBAs manage buffers is going to be
an improvement over automatic management.
the reason for a feature like that is to define an area of the application
which needs more
On 5/24/14, 8:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Vik Fearing writes:
>On 05/24/2014 12:03 AM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>Which lead us to the question: you need to connect to the database to
>>modify it, don't you? then, how do you change ALLOW CONNECTIONS to
>>true?
>You can ALTER DATABASE from anywhere.
David Rowley writes:
> I agree that there are not many cases left to remove the join that remain
> after is_simple_subquery() has decided not to pullup the subquery. Some of
> the perhaps more common cases would be having windowing functions in the
> subquery as this is what you need to do if you
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 05:08:04PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-05-18 14:49:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > While I'm at it: I could not help noticing RememberToFreeTupleDescAtEOX,
> > which was not there last time I looked at this code. Isn't that broken
> > by design? It's basically a de
Vik Fearing writes:
> On 05/24/2014 12:03 AM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> Which lead us to the question: you need to connect to the database to
>> modify it, don't you? then, how do you change ALLOW CONNECTIONS to
>> true?
> You can ALTER DATABASE from anywhere.
Perhaps it'd be wise to have a safet
11 matches
Mail list logo
