Jeff Davis escribió:
> I'm not sure what we should call the separate file or where we should
> put it, though. How about src/backend/utils/checksum/checksum_fnv.c? Is
> there a clean way to override the compiler flags for a single file so we
> don't need to put it in its own directory?
Sure, see
Thanks Steve.
I have read that a fix has been put in release 9.2.3 for this issue. Is that
right?
Thanks,
Anne
-Original Message-
From: Steve Singer [mailto:st...@ssinger.info]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 4:35 PM
To: Anne Rosset
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Pe
Michael,
* Michael Schuh (schuh.m...@gmail.com) wrote:
> In brief, I would like to implement a state-of-the-art indexing algorithm
> (named iDistance) directly in PostgreSQL using GiST or SP-GiST trees and
> whatever means necessary.
For my 2c, this sounds fantastic. Excellent project idea and
The function
static char *
path_encode(bool closed, int npts, Point *pt)
is actually occasionally passed -1 as its first parameter to mean
something like "neither" or "don't print any delimiters". That doesn't
seem like good style. Maybe this should be split off into another bool
parameter name
On Tue, 2013-04-23 at 01:08 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote:
> A slight delay, but here it is. I didn't lift the checksum part into a
> separate file as I didn't have a great idea what I would call it. The
> code is reasonably compact so I don't see a great need for this right
> now. It would be more worth
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Миша Тюрин wrote:
> free -g
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem: 378250128 0 0229
> -/+ buffers/cache: 20357
>
> and
> ! disks usage 100% (free 128GB
On 13-04-22 04:41 PM, Anne Rosset wrote:
Hi Steve,
Yes I see these messages in our log. Is there a solution to this?
Thanks,
Anne
A manual analyze of the effected tables should work and give you updated
statistics. If your problem is just statistics then that should help.
A manual vacuum will
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Миша Тюрин wrote:
>
> My first message has been banned for too many latters.
>
>>
> Hi all
> There is something wrong and ugly.
>
> 1)
> Intel 32 core = 2*8 *2threads
>
> Linux avi-sql09 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:00:17 UTC 2012 x86_64
> GNU/Linux
>
> Post
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Ants Aasma wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On 22 April 2013 20:32, Florian Pflug wrote:
>>
>>> Assuming that we only ship a plain C implementation with 9.3, what
>>> are we missing on that front? The C implementation of FNV1+SHIF
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 05:53:43PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Some more diacritics ..
Thanks, applied.
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-ha
Greetings,
Hello, my name is Michael Schuh and I am a PhD student in Computer Science
at Montana State University. I have never participated in GSOC before, but
I am very excited to propose a project to PostgreSQL that I feel would be a
great follow-up to last year's project by Alexander Korotkov
Some more diacritics ..
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.3.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/release-9.3.sgml
index 7c46bd3..68d04a7 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/release-9.3.sgml
+++ b/doc/sr
Hi Steve,
Yes I see these messages in our log. Is there a solution to this?
Thanks,
Anne
-Original Message-
From: Steve Singer [mailto:st...@ssinger.info]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 1:26 PM
To: Anne Rosset
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Performance with the new
On 13-04-22 04:15 PM, Anne Rosset wrote:
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your reply.
We are now running 9.0.13. Before it was 9.0.7.
How can I find out if we are running into this issue: "ie if statistics are no
longer being updated because analyze can't get the
exclusive lock for truncation"?
This issu
Hi Steve,
Thanks for your reply.
We are now running 9.0.13. Before it was 9.0.7.
How can I find out if we are running into this issue: "ie if statistics are no
longer being updated because analyze can't get the
exclusive lock for truncation"?
I will dig into our logs to see for the query times.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:11:48PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >Allow tooling like pg_receivexlog to run on computers with different
> >architectures (Heikki Linnakangas)
>
> This probably should be mentioned in the backwards-compatibility
> section. Any 3rd party tools that speak the stre
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:48:58PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:54:03PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > I am not sure if Tom shared yet, but we are planning to package 9.3
> > > > beta1 on April 29, with a release
On 13-04-22 01:38 PM, Anne Rosset wrote:
Hi,
We are seeing some overall performance degradation in our application
since we installed the security release. Other commits were also done
at the same time in the application so we don't know yet if the
degradation has any relationship with the se
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 22 April 2013 20:32, Florian Pflug wrote:
>
>> Assuming that we only ship a plain C implementation with 9.3, what
>> are we missing on that front? The C implementation of FNV1+SHIFT is
>> only a few dozen lines or so.
>
> Forgive me, I can
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 03:19:36PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> In this item
> >> Add support to event triggers (Dimitri Fontaine, Tom Lane)
> >> I am not sure why you list Tom. I think Robert should be listed
> >> instead.
> >
> > Tom d
On 22 April 2013 20:32, Florian Pflug wrote:
> Assuming that we only ship a plain C implementation with 9.3, what
> are we missing on that front? The C implementation of FNV1+SHIFT is
> only a few dozen lines or so.
Forgive me, I can't seem to locate the patch for this? Re-post please,
just for
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:54:03PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I am not sure if Tom shared yet, but we are planning to package 9.3
> > > beta1 on April 29, with a release on May 2. Those dates might change,
> > > but that is the current plan.
On Apr22, 2013, at 21:14 , Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 20:04 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
>> The one downside of the fnv1+shift approach is that it's built around
>> the assumption that processing 64-bytes at once is the sweet spot. That
>> might be true for x86 and x86_64 today, but
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 19:25 +0300, Ants Aasma wrote:
> I was just now writing up a generic C based patch based on the
> parallel FNV-1a + shift that we discussed with Florian with an added
> round of mixing. Testing the performance in isolation indicates that:
> 1) it is about an order of magnitude
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> In this item
>> Add support to event triggers (Dimitri Fontaine, Tom Lane)
>> I am not sure why you list Tom. I think Robert should be listed
>> instead.
>
> Tom did a massive fix/cleanup of that code. I have added Robert.
I do not thin
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> The biggest problem now is getting one of these faster algorithms (FNV
> or even a faster CRC) into shape that is acceptable to
> reviewers/committers. If we don't do that, we will be missing out on a
> lot of potential checksum users for whom t
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 20:04 +0200, Florian Pflug wrote:
> The one downside of the fnv1+shift approach is that it's built around
> the assumption that processing 64-bytes at once is the sweet spot. That
> might be true for x86 and x86_64 today, but it won't stay that way for
> long, and quite surely
Allow tooling like pg_receivexlog to run on computers with different
architectures (Heikki Linnakangas)
This probably should be mentioned in the backwards-compatibility
section. Any 3rd party tools that speak the streaming replication
protocol are affected.
E.1.3.2.1. Write-Ahead Log (WAL)
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Florian Pflug wrote:
> The one downside of the fnv1+shift approach is that it's built around
> the assumption that processing 64-bytes at once is the sweet spot. That
> might be true for x86 and x86_64 today, but it won't stay that way for
> long, and quite surely
Noah Misch pointed out something interesting to me:
/*
* PQputCopyEnd - send EOF indication to the backend during COPY IN
*
* After calling this, use PQgetResult() to check command completion status.
*
* Returns 1 if successful, 0 if data could not be sent (only possible
* in nonblock mode),
On 22 April 2013 19:04, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> We could do that and a similar mechanism existed in pg_standby, but
>> was removed in 9.0.
>
>
> That code is still in pg_standby. Maybe you were thinking of some other
> feature?
It wasn't removed from pg_standby. But since all the features o
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:54:03PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I am not sure if Tom shared yet, but we are planning to package 9.3
> > beta1 on April 29, with a release on May 2. Those dates might change,
> > but that is the current plan. I have completed a draft 9.3 r
Re-reading my first email I thought it was a little confusing, so here
is some clarification. In GetForeignPlan, tlist seems to be a target
list for a basic "select *" from the foreign table. For the ith
TargetEntry te in tlist, it seems that te->expr is a var with
varattno=i. I was mis-remembering
Hi Josh,
Thanks for your reply.
I don't think this is the case since we are using jboss/jdbc driver with a
connection pool.
Thanks,
Anne
-Original Message-
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:j...@agliodbs.com]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 10:58 AM
To: Anne Rosset
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgres
On Apr22, 2013, at 18:25 , Ants Aasma wrote:
> I was just now writing up a generic C based patch based on the
> parallel FNV-1a + shift that we discussed with Florian with an added
> round of mixing. Testing the performance in isolation indicates that:
> 1) it is about an order of magnitude faster
On 22.04.2013 18:45, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 22 April 2013 16:09, Shaun Thomas wrote:
On 04/22/2013 02:58 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
So, to initiate promotion, you can create a file called
$DATADIR/fast_promote or $DATADIR/promote
Pardon my naiveté, but could it also be an option to read the met
On 04/22/2013 09:25 AM, Ants Aasma wrote:
> This leaves lingering doubts about the quality of the checksum. It's
> hard if not impossible to prove absence of interesting patterns that
> would trigger collisions. I do know the checksum quality is miles
> ahead of the Fletcher sum originally proposed
On 04/22/2013 10:38 AM, Anne Rosset wrote:
> While we are digging into this, I would like to know if it is possible
> that the release has some impact on performance. After reading this
> "It was created as a side effect of a refactoring effort to make
> establishing new connections to a Pos
On 04/22/2013 10:38 AM, Anne Rosset wrote:
> While we are digging into this, I would like to know if it is possible
> that the release has some impact on performance. After reading this
> "It was created as a side effect of a refactoring effort to make
> establishing new connections to a Pos
Hi,
We are seeing some overall performance degradation in our application
since we installed the security release. Other commits were also done
at the same time in the application so we don't know yet if the
degradation has any relationship with the security release.
While we are digging int
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I am not sure if Tom shared yet, but we are planning to package 9.3
> beta1 on April 29, with a release on May 2. Those dates might change,
> but that is the current plan. I have completed a draft 9.3 release
> notes, which you can view here:
>
> http://momjian.us/pg
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> I don't see us changing away from CRCs anymore either by now. But I
> think at least changing the polynom to something that
> a) has higher error detection properties
> b) can noticeably sped up on a a good part of the hardware pg is run on
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
>>> The more I read of this thread, the more unhappy I get. It appears that
>>> the entire design process is being driven by micro-optimization for CPUs
>>> being built by Intel in 2013.
>>
>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
wrote:
> Please also note that the first series of patches did include the
> support code for all the core PL, but Robert didn't feel like commiting
> that and no other commiter did step up.
Of course, the chances of that would have been a lot hig
On 22 April 2013 16:09, Shaun Thomas wrote:
> On 04/22/2013 02:58 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>> So, to initiate promotion, you can create a file called
>> $DATADIR/fast_promote or $DATADIR/promote
>
>
> Pardon my naiveté, but could it also be an option to read the method from
> the promotion file?
>
On 22 April 2013 09:29, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Hmm. That requires write access to $DATADIR, so that's not quite the same
> thing as the trigger_file recovery.conf option.
Well, you also (elsewhere) requested that we must keep recovery.conf
in $DATADIR, so it needs to be writable.
--
Simon
On 2013-04-22 11:27:25 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> >> The more I read of this thread, the more unhappy I get. It appears that
> >> the entire design process is being driven by micro-optimization for CPUs
> >> being built by Intel in 2013.
> >
>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
>> The more I read of this thread, the more unhappy I get. It appears that
>> the entire design process is being driven by micro-optimization for CPUs
>> being built by Intel in 2013.
>
> And that's not going to get anyone past review, since all
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think this breaks contrib/adminpack, and perhaps other extensions.
> They'd not be hard to fix with script changes, but they'd be broken.
>
> In general, we would now have a situation where relocatable extensions
> could never be installed into
On 04/22/2013 02:58 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
So, to initiate promotion, you can create a file called
$DATADIR/fast_promote or $DATADIR/promote
Pardon my naiveté, but could it also be an option to read the method
from the promotion file?
echo "slow" > /my/promotion/path
That would work without
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-04-22 18:35:04 +0530, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have observed that following sequence is causing server crash.
> >
> > CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW temp_class_mv AS
> > SELECT * FROM pg_class
> > WITH NO DATA;
> >
> > CRE
On 2013-04-22 18:35:04 +0530, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have observed that following sequence is causing server crash.
>
> CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW temp_class_mv AS
> SELECT * FROM pg_class
> WITH NO DATA;
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_refresh_mv()
> RETURNS int
> AS $$
> BEGIN
Hi,
I have observed that following sequence is causing server crash.
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW temp_class_mv AS
SELECT * FROM pg_class
WITH NO DATA;
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_refresh_mv()
RETURNS int
AS $$
BEGIN
REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW temp_class_mv;
return 1;
END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgs
On 22.04.2013 10:58, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 22 April 2013 08:13, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
2. There is no way to perform 'fast promotion' using the trigger file. That
feature is only available using "pg_ctl promote". When "pg_ctl promote" was
introduced, it was not meant to replace the trigger f
On 22 April 2013 08:13, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> We never reached a consensus on the user interface of the new 'fast
> promotion'. We should settle that before beta. The thread died here:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+U5nMKmDD7hGCYzOo=iFM=eK5OPDXCEzmq79fgLWr0TJk=s...@mail.gmail.co
We never reached a consensus on the user interface of the new 'fast
promotion'. We should settle that before beta. The thread died here:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+U5nMKmDD7hGCYzOo=iFM=eK5OPDXCEzmq79fgLWr0TJk=s...@mail.gmail.com
Simon said in that email that he's waiting for furthe
56 matches
Mail list logo
