Peter Eisentraut writes:
> Could we generated sha256 files for the release tarballs, instead of the
> md5 files that are currently generated? The packaging systems that I
> surveyed that verify the checksum of the tarball (FreeBSD ports and the
> like) don't use md5 anymore, so a sha256 file woul
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 21:51 +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> This more or less works in stable environments, but once you start
>> dropping databases (think of hosting with shared DB server) it gets
>> unusable because after DROP DATABASE the
Could we generated sha256 files for the release tarballs, instead of the
md5 files that are currently generated? The packaging systems that I
surveyed that verify the checksum of the tarball (FreeBSD ports and the
like) don't use md5 anymore, so a sha256 file would be much more useful
for direct v
On 04/14/2013 05:56 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2013-04-12 02:29:01 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
You just shut down the old master and let the standby catch
up (takas a few microseconds ;)
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-04-12 02:29:01 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Hannu Krosing
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > You just shut down the old master and let the standby catch
>> > up (takas a few microseconds ;) ) before you promote it
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On 04/11/2013 07:29 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Hannu Krosing
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> You just shut down the old master and let the standby catch
>>> up (takas a few microseconds ;) ) before you promote it.
>>>
>
Re: Tom Lane 2013-04-12 <20318.1365786...@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Robert Haas writes:
> > The hunk that changes the messages might need some thought so that it
> > doesn't cause a translation regression. But in general I see no
> > reason not to do this before we release beta1. It seems safe enough,
>
