Folks,
Per suggestions and lots of help from Andrew Gierth, please find
attached a patch to clean up the call sites for FuncCall nodes, which
I'd like to expand centrally rather than in each of the 37 (or 38, but
I only redid 37) places where it's called. The remaining one is in
src/backend/nodes
On Saturday, February 09, 2013 9:03 AM Tom Lane wrote:
Amit kapila writes:
>>> if (!is_projection_capable_plan(result_plan) &&
>>> compare_tlist_exprs(sub_tlist, result_plan->targetlist) )
>> Sorry, the check I suggested in last mail should be as below:
>> if (!is_projection_capable_plan(result
Magnus Hagander escribió:
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Peter Geoghegan
> wrote:
> > On 9 February 2013 15:24, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> It's in your personal majordomo settings. I don't think it's related
> >> to that at all, but it's a flag you set on your subscription, so
> >> perhaps yo
I've spent the afternoon reading and documenting gistsplit.c, and
finally feel like I understand what's going on in there, particularly
with respect to the secondary-split logic of log-spam infamy. I'll be
committing the results of that in a bit, but meanwhile: what I now
realize is that the "fall
On 09-02-2013 13:45, Gurjeet Singh wrote:
> BTW, I hope I understand what selfcopy is: send a copy to yourself. Why would
> that be turned on by default?
>
If you want to reply to yourself...
--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria,
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>
>> We do not already have this. There is no relevant spec. I can't see
>> how this could need pg_dump support (but what about pg_upgrade?)
>
> pg_dump - no
>
> pg_upgrage - IMHO it should create the pg_stat directory. I don't think
> it could
> This is not entirely unrelated to the discussions about allowing
> broader use of automatic casting server-side. It seems to me that
> on one side of the argument is the idea that strict typing reduces
> bugs and doesn't lead to problems with ambiguity, especially as
> things change; and on the
2013/2/9 Dean Rasheed :
>> 2013/1/31 Pavel Stehule :
>>> I am sending rewritten code
>
> Nice. I think this will be very useful, and it looks like it now
> supports everything that printf() does for %s format specifiers, and
> it's good that %I and %L behave the same. Also the code is looking
> cle
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 07:01:07PM -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 05:46:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Marko Kreen writes:
> > > On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> > >> How about instead calling RAND_cleanup() after each backend fork?
> >
> > > Attached is
Josh Hansen writes:
> We've been seeing these same messages flying by our logs for years:
> 2012-12-13 22:28:07 GMT LOG: picksplit method for column 2 of index
> "xxx_idx" doesn't support secondary split
> I see from the linked message that Tom Lane made the recommendation of
> ch
n and replacing the couple of XXX
comments. I'll add it to the next commitfest.
Regards,
Mark
add_spigettypmod-20130209.diff
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
I tried the lists page and disabled the 'selfcopy' since the 'ackpot' was
kinda hidden under the mailing list names. I have updated the settings
again to disable ackpost, and enable the selfcopy. This email will be test
if that worked.
BTW, I hope I understand what selfcopy is: send a copy to you
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Peter Geoghegan
wrote:
> On 9 February 2013 15:24, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> It's in your personal majordomo settings. I don't think it's related
>> to that at all, but it's a flag you set on your subscription, so
>> perhaps you set it by mistake.
>
> Then I must h
On 9 February 2013 15:24, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> It's in your personal majordomo settings. I don't think it's related
> to that at all, but it's a flag you set on your subscription, so
> perhaps you set it by mistake.
Then I must have set it by mistake too, when I recently changed e-mail
addres
It's in your personal majordomo settings. I don't think it's related
to that at all, but it's a flag you set on your subscription, so
perhaps you set it by mistake.
You shold be able to set it from https://mail.postgresql.org. The
setting you're looking for is "ackpost", and you'll want to turn it
Recently I have started getting these confirmations for every email I send
to the mailing lists. I think it's related to the fact that I recently
switched to using a new email address.
How can I turn these notifications off?
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Cédric Villemain wrote:
> Le samedi 23 juin 2012 02:47:15, Josh Berkus a écrit :
> > > The biggest problem with pgfincore from my point of view is that it
> > > only works under Linux, whereas I use a MacOS X machine for my
> > > development, and there is also Wind
> 2013/1/31 Pavel Stehule :
>> I am sending rewritten code
Nice. I think this will be very useful, and it looks like it now
supports everything that printf() does for %s format specifiers, and
it's good that %I and %L behave the same. Also the code is looking
cleaner.
>> It indirect width "*" and
Hi!
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Jeff Davis wrote:
> I have attached a patch with some significant edits.
>
> * In your patch, there was still an inconsistency between the comment
> for bounds_adjacent and the code. I refactored it to ensure it always
> takes the upper bound as boundA, and t
On 8 February 2013 10:23, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> to solve two problems:
>>
>> 1. maximize the efficiency of existing reviewer time
>>
>> 2. make tooling not be an obstacle to getting new reviewers
>
> I think you are missing a fundamental part in this - which is "0.
> don't negatively affect t
> I might be confused here, but I think the point is that if you pass
> "true" as the third argument to set_config, the setting lasts only for
> the duration of the current transaction, like SET LOCAL. Which I
> think solves your problem.
Yes, but at the end of transaction it is reset to the val
Hello
In Czech discussion group was reported performance regression of CTE
query. I wrote a test, when I can show it.
Execution on 9.2, 9.3 is about 9 sec, on 8.4, 9.1 is about 30ms with
default work_mem ='1MB'
optimal plan (8.4)
QUERY PLAN
On Sat, February 9, 2013 06:24, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> psql: Improve expanded print output in tuples-only mode
>
> When there are zero result rows, in expanded mode, "(No rows)" is
> printed. So far, there was no way to turn this off. Now, when
> tuples-only mode is turned on, nothing is print
23 matches
Mail list logo
