contrib/stringfunc was missing this small change in contrib/Makefile, I think.
With it, it
installs and runs make check cleanly.
Erik Rijkers
stringfunc_fix.diff
Description: Binary data
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscript
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> On lör, 2010-07-10 at 12:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I believe the project standard is to make things readable
>> in an 80-column window --- anyone have an objection to stating that
>> explicitly?
> Is that what pgindent reformats it to?
pgindent tries to leave a cha
On lör, 2010-07-10 at 12:45 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I believe the project standard is to make things readable
> in an 80-column window --- anyone have an objection to stating that
> explicitly?
Is that what pgindent reformats it to?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgre
On fre, 2010-06-11 at 07:00 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The second problem is that the prototype check for accept() fails.
> This
> is because glibc defines the second argument to be a "transparent
> union", apparently to make it look like a lot of things at once.
> clang
> apparently doesn't
Tom Lane wrote:
BTW, I notice that that page fails to mention anything about preferred
window width. I believe the project standard is to make things readable
in an 80-column window --- anyone have an objection to stating that
explicitly?
No, on the contrary, I'm in favor of stating it.
On lör, 2010-07-10 at 16:23 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Wow, how would they know if the binaries are MinGW compiled? Does it
> show in version()?
Yes, I think so.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> That laves the questions of docs - right now the docs just say it
>> works on windows. I guess we need to add some kind of disclaimer
>> around that, but the fact is that for 99+% of our windows users it
>> will work - since they use the binaries,
David Fetter writes:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 01:53:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, this patch is still a few bricks shy of a load, since there's
>> no kwlist.h change and so the new MERGE keyword couldn't possibly be
>> recognized. More generally, I'm wondering why the original .rar
>> subm
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > An easy approximation would be to make the code #ifdef SIO_KEEPALIVE_VALS.
> > That would fail if the mingw guys decide to provide the #define without
> > adding the struct at the same time, but that seems moderately unlikely.
>
> Seems reasonable. I'll go do something a
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 9:04 PM, C?dric Villemain
> wrote:
> >>> > I assume this did not get done for 9.0. ?Do we want a TODO item?
> >>>
> >>> Yes.
> >>
> >> Added:
> >>
> >> ? ? ? ?Reduce locking required for ALTER commands
> >
> > I just faced production issue where it is im
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 01:53:53PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
> > By the way, "make check" fails here with attached initdb.log:
>
> > creating system views ... FATAL: unrecognized token: "false"
>
> Hm, I'd suspect something fouled up in keyword recognition. Did you
> do a "
On lör, 2010-07-10 at 09:26 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> Please find enclosed a patch against git master as of
> 7b2668159bb4d0f5177a23d05bf7c2ab00bc0d75. It works up to make, but
> fails on make check.
It looks like this implementation reaches about the same level of parser
support as the stuff
David Fetter writes:
> By the way, "make check" fails here with attached initdb.log:
> creating system views ... FATAL: unrecognized token: "false"
Hm, I'd suspect something fouled up in keyword recognition.
Did you do a "make clean" and rebuild?
BTW, this patch is still a few bricks shy of a
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 10:39:02AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 01:18:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Robert Haas writes:
> > > Though, if the worst problem with this patch is the formatting, we're
> > > doing *quite* well.
> >
> > Well, the worst problem with it is that
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 01:18:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > Though, if the worst problem with this patch is the formatting, we're doing
> > *quite* well.
>
> Well, the worst problem with it is that it hasn't touched the
> interesting part, ie, what happens at execution ti
Robert Haas writes:
> Though, if the worst problem with this patch is the formatting, we're doing
> *quite* well.
Well, the worst problem with it is that it hasn't touched the
interesting part, ie, what happens at execution time. I haven't
seen a design for that, which means it's impossible to
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 09:26:38AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:52:31AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:33:04PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Boxuan Zhai wrote:
> > > > Dear All,
> > > >
> > > > This is ZHAI B
On Jul 10, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter writes:
>> Please find enclosed a patch against git master as of
>> 7b2668159bb4d0f5177a23d05bf7c2ab00bc0d75. It works up to make, but
>> fails on make check.
>
> There seem to be about four different comment styles used in this patch
David Fetter writes:
> Please find enclosed a patch against git master as of
> 7b2668159bb4d0f5177a23d05bf7c2ab00bc0d75. It works up to make, but
> fails on make check.
There seem to be about four different comment styles used in this patch,
none of which match the project standard:
http://devel
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 11:52:31AM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:33:04PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Boxuan Zhai wrote:
> > > Dear All,
> > >
> > > This is ZHAI BOXUAN, a student of gSoC 2010. My project is to add merge
> > > command in
Robert Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On ons, 2010-07-07 at 16:37 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
Here's the patch to add the 'xml_is_well_formed' function.
I suppose we should remove the function from contrib/xml2 at the same
time.
Yep
R
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Yeb Havinga wrote:
> > Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 16:57 +0200, Yeb Havinga wrote:
> >>> Hello list,
> >>>
> >>> Due to dependency requirements my development machine has ubuntu
> >>> repo
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 11:33:04PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Boxuan Zhai wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > This is ZHAI BOXUAN, a student of gSoC 2010. My project is to add merge
> > command in postgres.
> > There is a more detailed instruction in readme.
I would find
23 matches
Mail list logo
