Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_statements

2008-06-22 Thread ITAGAKI Takahiro
I wrote: > I will try to measure overheads of logging in some implementation: > 1. Log statements and dump them into server logs. > 2. Log statements and filter them before to be written. > 3. Store statements in shared memory. > I know 1 is slow, but I don't know what part of it is really sl

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres + Window manager

2008-06-22 Thread Dmitry Turin
Josh, Can i hope to your interest ? >>> I stated details of proposal on page 2-13, 67-75 of pdf-document >>> http://sql50.euro.ru/sql5.16.4.pdf , and i ask to implement it. >>> All my proposals are public domain. JB>> I'm confused. You're planning to develop this DT> I can't make this alone. JB>

[HACKERS] Talking at New York PHP meeting

2008-06-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
FYI, I will be presenting at this Tuesday evening's New York PHP meeting. I will be mostly talking about EnterpriseDB's Postgres Plus: http://www.nyphp.org/index.php -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterpr

Re: [HACKERS] ...Roll Back issue in PGSQL..

2008-06-22 Thread Robert Treat
On Friday 20 June 2008 12:19:03 Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Fri, 2008-06-20 at 13:10 +0530, Deepak wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am trying to create a TRIGGER function,that populates values to > > another table upon inserting a value into a table. The issue is,if > > there is a exception(in Table 2) ever

Re: [HACKERS] Backend Stats Enhancement Request

2008-06-22 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Thomas Lee wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Tom. An initial patch for this has been posted > to pgsql-patches. Thanks for the patch. I have added it to the current Commitfest wiki page. If you plan to continue sending patches, please make sure you get an account to do that yourself. Thanks.

Re: [HACKERS] Backend Stats Enhancement Request

2008-06-22 Thread Thomas Lee
Thanks for the feedback Tom. An initial patch for this has been posted to pgsql-patches. Cheers, T Tom Lane wrote: Thomas Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: How does this sound: * A new GUC variable -- "activity_message_size" -- will be introduced Well, "message" doesn't see