Gurjeet Singh wrote:
Thomas, I love the idea of eclipse; any platform, any language,
one IDE. I am downloading it right now. Can you please send in the
steps that you perform to setup the environment, including mingw
toolkit; I will try to grow on that.
My setup is pretty basic. I can't give
On Sun, 07 May 2006 13:09:48 -0400
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> imacat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I cannot compile PL/Perl and PL/Python under x86_64.
> Works fine for me (without any tinkering with flags) on Fedora Core 4.
> Maybe you don't have 64-bit versions of the perl and py
imacat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I cannot compile PL/Perl and PL/Python under x86_64.
Works fine for me (without any tinkering with flags) on Fedora Core 4.
Maybe you don't have 64-bit versions of the perl and python libraries?
regards, tom lane
--
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seeing as how width is so unused relative to the other items in the
> explain output,
Huh? It's a critical part of the cost calculations for some things
(eg, sort and hash operations).
regards, tom lane
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 04:03:45PM -, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Seeing as how width is so unused relative to the other items in the
> explain output, how about removing it from the normal explain output
> and requiring people to do an explain verbose if they really need to
> see it? It would
Dear all,
I cannot compile PL/Perl and PL/Python under x86_64. I'm running
Intel Pentium D 3.2GHz Dual-core, Debian GNU/Linux AMD64 port, kernel
2.6.16.14, gcc 3.4.4, glibc 2.3.2, perl 5.8.8, Python 2.4.3.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ % uname -a
Linux yuki 2.6.16.14-allmods #1 SMP Sat May 6 18:25:11
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seeing as how width is so unused relative to the other items in the
explain output, how about removing it from the normal explain output
and requiring people to do an explain verbose if they really need to
see it? It would have the virtue of shorteni
On 5/5/06, Jonah H. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/5/06, Gurjeet Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If it is such a 'simple porting', may I ask why hasn't it been
> attempted successfuly in so many years of PG's history?
Because most of use don't use Windows... I thought I said that.
B
(missed the mailing list last time)
Hi William,
Thanks for the steps to succeed with vcproject. I am sure that
there will be a few more tweaks involved (like setting VC's include
path etc.). I will try to build it and consult/inform you if there is
any deviation from the README.
This will
