On Wed, 17 Aug 2005, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > > I think this would take some generalization of afterTriggerInvokeEvents,
> > > which now might or might not find the target rel in the EState it's
> > > pass
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Chuck McDevitt wrote:
>> I think it's because it's __stdcall, and the name gets mangled to
>> include the number of parameters.
> Aha! now it makes sense. How do we get around that in the configure tests?
I thought it might be something like that ...
Dear Josh and Andrew,
Thanks for the prompt replies. For now it's just a paper. It was Rob and
Pim's mission to find out if the SQL /XML standard can be implemented
using the postgresql extension mechanism. Building it into the parser was
no option.
Best, Djoerd.
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andrew D
Chuck McDevitt wrote:
I think it's because it's __stdcall, and the name gets mangled to
include the number of parameters.
Aha! now it makes sense. How do we get around that in the configure tests?
cheers
andrew
---(end of broadcast)---
I think it's because it's __stdcall, and the name gets mangled to
include the number of parameters.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:44 PM
> To: Chuck McDevitt
> Cc: Tom Lane; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [H
The mingw header has pretty much this with WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE IN OUT
and FAR dissolved away.
The standard test complains about it being an unresolved reference when
it is declared as "char getaddrinfo (); ". If we remove that and instead
include the header the test passes. I have no idea w
IPv6 exists in a "production quality" state only in XP sp1, XP sp2, and
Windows 2003.
There was an optional prototype stack for 2000, but not production
quality and not installed by default. XP non-service-pack had IPv6,
but not production-quality.
One thing you could do is dynamically load get
Paul Tillotson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For some time, I have wondered: what does postgres use "t_ctid chains"
> for? It seems like it is useful to find the "newer" version of a
> tuple. However, wouldn't that eventually get found anyway? A
> sequential scan scans the whole table, and so
The definition in WS2tcpip.h
WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE
int
WSAAPI
getaddrinfo(
IN const char FAR * nodename,
IN const char FAR * servname,
IN const struct addrinfo FAR * hints,
OUT struct addrinfo FAR * FAR * res
);
(IN, FAR, and OUT are #defined to empty string).
WINSOCK_API_LINK
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interesting failure mode. While reading it I was suddenly struck by the
> thought that overwriting storage managers may somehow be more resistent
> to these kind of failures. This may well be true, because there is
> never need for a VACUUM process whi
(Prompted by nearby thread about VACUUM FULL bugs, but not having
anything to do with that properly speaking.)
Hackers,
For some time, I have wondered: what does postgres use "t_ctid chains"
for? It seems like it is useful to find the "newer" version of a
tuple. However, wouldn't that event
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> . what do we do about the getaddrinfo test? I'm almost inclined not to
> do it on windows, and assume that if we have ws2_32.dll we have it.
There's something mighty fishy about that. AC_REPLACE_FUNCS works on
Windows for the other cases it's used for
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 03:48:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The only solution I can see (short of abandoning lazy VACUUM) is that
> we have to make the code that follows t_ctid chains more wary. That
> code is already aware (at least in the places I looked at) that a t_ctid
> link might lead to a
I have just managed to get pg server and client (cvs tip) talking IPv6
on Windows. :-)
1. Building
- added in library in configure.in:
AC_CHECK_LIB(ws2_32, main)
- faked out getaddrinfo test in resulting configure and force answer
to "yes"
- added these lines to sr
I believe I've traced down the cause of the Assert trap in VACUUM FULL
that Teodor reported here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-06/msg01278.php
The case that VACUUM is tripping up on is one in which some concurrent
transaction (call it X1) updates and then later deletes a row.
Oleg,
> ERROR: column "query.query" must appear in the GROUP BY clause or be
> used in an aggregate function
Apparently the parser thinks you have an aggregate function in there. Do
you?
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
---(end of broadc
Hi there,
I don't understand why this select doesn't works:
regression=# select coalesce(
tp_rewrite_substitute(ARRAY[query, test.target, test.sample]),
query)
from test,to_tsquery('new2 & york2 & hotel') as query
where query @ te
Folks,
Those of you who went to OSCON may have heard that SpikeSource is having a
contest to increase testing code coverage of popular OSS projects. The
contest involves prizes of up to $2500 for test writers.
Given that we have people in the community who have been thinking about
testing, an
IIRC, Peter Eisentraut noted a while ago that implementing the SQL/XML
functions properly would require building them into the postgresql
parser as special cases. That of course would mean we wouldn't be using
the extension mechanism, and is something we should normally shy away
from, but I t
I'm thinking about GiST approach http://www.cs.arizona.edu/xiss/
Oleg
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Djoerd Hiemstra wrote:
Dear PostreSQL hackers,
For the interested, here:
http://www.cs.utwente.nl/~hiemstra/courses/reports/sqlxml.pdf
you find a little report discussing possibilities to implement the
Paul, Rob,
I just read with some interest your paper on XML queries with PostgreSQL.
I'm particularly puzzled by some of your conclusions, and thought you might
want to discuss them with the PGSQL-Hackers mailing list.
Particulary:
Functions should be able to have a variable amount of argumen
Djoerd,
> http://www.cs.utwente.nl/~hiemstra/courses/reports/sqlxml.pdf
> you find a little report discussing possibilities to implement the
> SQL/XML standard using the PostgreSQL extension mechanism. The report is
> written by Master students following the course "XML & Databases" at U
> Twen
Ali Baba wrote:
Hi Michael,
i want to support explicit commit/rollback support
in pl/pgsql instead of using autocommit feature.
The fine manual is your friend:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/transaction-iso.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/tutorial-transactions.htm
Hi Michael,
i want to support explicit commit/rollback support
in pl/pgsql instead of using autocommit feature.
my requirement is to know how transactions work in
postgres generally and how to support transaction
managment in pl/pgsql
thanks for your help.
--
Asif Ali.
> --- Michael Fuhr
Dear PostreSQL hackers,
For the interested, here:
http://www.cs.utwente.nl/~hiemstra/courses/reports/sqlxml.pdf
you find a little report discussing possibilities to implement the
SQL/XML standard using the PostgreSQL extension mechanism. The report is
written by Master students following the
> "Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Doing some testing on upcoming 8.1 devel and am having serious
issues
> > with new bitmap index scan feature. It is easy to work around (just
> > disable it) but IMO the planner is using it when a regular index
scan
> > should be strongly favored.
""Marc G. Fournier"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>
> I've done a grep through the code, to see if its something that we do use,
and
> it doesn't seem to come back with anything ... I believe its considered
> common knowledge that 'swapping' for a database is evil, so am wondering
> if there is some
27 matches
Mail list logo