On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 03:43:04PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > The email below about FreeBSD's involvement in Google's Summer of Code
> > got me thinking; would there be value in trying to attract college
> > students to working on either PostgreSQL development, or using
> >
I am doing it right
/usr/local/pgsql/bin/initdb -D /usr/local/pgsql/data
Thomas F. O'Connell wrote:
Do you already have a postgres user on the system? And do you mean
that initdb is not creating a postgres user in the database?
Presumably, if run as the user that will own the server process
Do you already have a postgres user on the system? And do you mean
that initdb is not creating a postgres user in the database?
Presumably, if run as the user that will own the server process, it
should create that user in the database as well.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/app-
Hi,
Having an issue with 10.4.2 at the moment when i initialize the
database no user is being created.
I have setup Postgresql 8.0.3 on 10.3 without any issue, has anyone come
accross this problem before?
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Do
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
Fixed --- but maybe we ought to do something to test the INSTALL/HISTORY
documentation build as well as the main SGML docs. Or maybe better, do
something to make failures o
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Fixed --- but maybe we ought to do something to test the INSTALL/HISTORY
>> documentation build as well as the main SGML docs. Or maybe better, do
>> something to make failures of the nightly snapshot build ca
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
openjade -V draft-mode -D . -c /usr/local/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl/modular/catalog
-d stylesheet.dsl -i output-text -t sgml -V nochunks standalone-install.sgml
installation.sgml >INSTALL.html
openjade:installa
There appear to be several bugs in the at time zone
patch recently applied.
show timezone; TimeZone
-- UTC(1 row)
select
now();
now
--- 2005-07-20 23:38:57.981128+00(1
row)
***
WORKS ***
select CURRENT_DATE + '05:00
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> openjade -V draft-mode -D . -c
> /usr/local/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl/modular/catalog -d stylesheet.dsl -i
> output-text -t sgml -V nochunks standalone-install.sgml installation.sgml
> >INSTALL.html
> openjade:installation.sgml:873:44:X: reference
Did I miss a docbook upgrade or something here?
openjade -V draft-mode -D . -c /usr/local/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl/modular/catalog
-d stylesheet.dsl -i output-text -t sgml -V nochunks standalone-install.sgml
installation.sgml >INSTALL.html
openjade:installation.sgml:873:44:X: reference to non-
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> The email below about FreeBSD's involvement in Google's Summer of Code
> got me thinking; would there be value in trying to attract college
> students to working on either PostgreSQL development, or using
> PostgreSQL in projects? Even though we missed getting in on the summer
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
At least on my machine, the latest Cygwin seems to break
comprehensively, with a SEGV when starting postmaster. It looks like
it is failing ion the code that looks for the highest settable FD, but
it's hard to say - the stack gets corrupted so getting a reliable
ba
At least on my machine, the latest Cygwin seems to break
comprehensively, with a SEGV when starting postmaster. It looks like
it is failing ion the code that looks for the highest settable FD, but
it's hard to say - the stack gets corrupted so getting a reliable
backtrace is hard. Can anyon
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 12:52:28PM +0200, Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> On 7/20/05, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Since it's also possible to do partitioning with UNION ALL, maybe it
> > > would be better if there was an option to explain that told it either to
> > > show or not show info
On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 10:32:00AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> In short, OS X > 10.2 wasn't a supported platform when 7.2/7.3 came out,
> and I don't want to retroactively try to make it so.
All I needed to hear. I'll pull those from cuckoo's config.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant
On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 05:47:37PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 06:06:00PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > [EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]:00]~/buildfarm/HEAD/pgsqlkeep.1121809875/src/pl/plpython:41%otool
> > -L libplpython.0.0.so
> > libplpython.0.0.so:
> > /System/Library/
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Couldn't we just run the distprep actions (flex, bison) through contrib
> as well? That wouldn't hurt anyone, I think.
No objection here (though of course it doesn't affect the buildfarm issue).
regards, tom lane
--
Tom Lane wrote:
> This is a considerably bigger issue for the buildfarm than it would
> be for ordinary users of our distribution, since in the distro it's
> only the contrib modules that you actually need to run through your
> local flex.
Couldn't we just run the distprep actions (flex, bison) th
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We don't rely on any one write of them to work, but that doesn't mean
>> that we can indefinitely postpone writing them.
> OK, I think I understand where you're coming from now.
Apparently not :-(
> W
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 09:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 22:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> Short patch enclosed to turn off writing of commit-status hint bits.
> >>
> >> Doesn't this entire
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And 7.3 is also failing, with a different error:
> ccache gcc -traditional-cpp -g -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -g -Wall
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -I../../../../src/include
> -I/opt/local/include -c -o printtup.o printtup.c
> In file in
--On tisdag, juli 19, 2005 15.11.31 -0400 Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-07/msg00096.php describes
what I think is causing octopus to fail. What's also interesting is
these patches from the FreeBSD
On Jul 20, 2005, at 5:58 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
Hi, i have just installed 10.4 on one of our machines and cannot
get past this error during make
/usr/bin/libtool: for architecture: cputype (16777234) cpusubtype
(0) file: -lSystem is not an object file (not allowed in a library)
I
On 7/20/05, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Since it's also possible to do partitioning with UNION ALL, maybe it
> > would be better if there was an option to explain that told it either to
> > show or not show info about eliminated partitions. That would seem to
> > serve the general ca
Jamie,
That's strange, I have 8.03 building fine on 10.4 ? Did you simply do
a make without a make clean and run configure again ?
Dave
On 20-Jul-05, at 3:37 AM, Jamie Deppeler wrote:
Hi, i have just installed 10.4 on one of our machines and cannot
get past this error during make
gcc -no
Hi, i have just installed 10.4 on one of our machines and cannot get
past this error during make
gcc -no-cpp-precomp -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -dynamiclib -install_name
/usr/local/pgsql/lib/libpq.4.dylib -compatibility_version 4
-curr
26 matches
Mail list logo
