Tzahi Fadida wrote:
I think the solution can be either changing the FETCH_ALL to
INT_MAX or changing the interface parameter count and subsequent usages
to long.
I think changing SPI_cursor_fetch() and SPI_cursor_move() to take a
"long" for the "count" parameter is the right fix for HEAD. It would
Just wanted to address a couple of specific items here...
On Saturday 30 April 2005 08:54, Rob Butler wrote:
> I read the hackers list all the time, and have for
> years, and my company sponsors PG events every few
> months, and I would consider myself fairly "plugged
> in" to PG, and this is the
On Saturday 30 April 2005 06:05, Kris Jurka wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Nicolai Petri (lists) wrote:
> > We also use PostgreSQL as our primary db so it would be more than likely
> > that we would donate money for something similar with postgresql if
> > either :
> > a) we can direct the money a
Greets, [apologies if an earlier dup gets "unswallowed"]
Well, I've been solo'ing it for over a year now, and it's definitely
time to make my presence known to the community and invite others to
participate as I can't keep putting it off as I have been. There has
always been something else that I
On Saturday 30 April 2005 17:40, David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:37:06AM +0200, Nicolai Petri (lists) wrote:
> > I totally agree. In our preference list I would have the following tasks
> > : 1) IOT (Index Ordered Tables)
>
> Is this different from CLUSTER?
>
I think what he is l
Just finished writing the PG rules to maintain a bunch of materialized
(aggregate) views on a ROLAP cube --- yes, I've seen Jonathan
Gardner's "matview" for postgres; didnt cover what I needed :-(. PG
happens to be pretty convenient for roll-your-own OLAP, thanks to
RULES and ARRAY datatypes. S
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 05:31:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (elein) writes:
> > On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:17:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It is trivial to crash 8.0's record_out
> >> by lying to it about the rowtype of its first argument.
>
> > Is it not as trivial to crash
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 16:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> An example that Elein put up yesterday:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-04/msg01384.php
> caused me to realize that type output functions that depend on
> additional arguments to determine what they are dealing with are
> fund
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 10:37:06AM +0200, Nicolai Petri (lists) wrote:
> >Anyone interested in pooling funds for features should take a look at
> >http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/funding.html, which is about a FreeBSD
> >developer who offered to work full-time on developing some specific
> >features
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (elein) writes:
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:17:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It is trivial to crash 8.0's record_out
>> by lying to it about the rowtype of its first argument.
> Is it not as trivial to crash it if one passes bad data into it?
> Why is the oid arg worse than the
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:17:59PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> An example that Elein put up yesterday:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-04/msg01384.php
> caused me to realize that type output functions that depend on
> additional arguments to determine what they are dealing with are
There was some previous discussion in a thread starting at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-01/msg00750.php
about expanding the pg_locks view to provide more useful support
for contrib/userlock locks. Also, the changes Alvaro and I just
finished for sharable row locks mean that th
An example that Elein put up yesterday:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-04/msg01384.php
caused me to realize that type output functions that depend on
additional arguments to determine what they are dealing with are
fundamentally security holes. It is trivial to crash 8.0's recor
On Saturday 30 April 2005 02:02, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > We'd like to avoid such unpleasant surprises, but how to get the word
> > out?
>
> More prominent placement of how to contribute would probably help. The
> PGF could help with this as well once it is done. Right now it is ether
> on how to
pgman wrote:
> Kris Jurka wrote:
> > One thing that definitely would be nice would be to be able to combine
> > funds from various sponsors for various features. Alone a company can't
> > spring for it, but by pooling resources it could get done. This is a lot
> > tougher to coordinate and unl
Kris Jurka wrote:
> One thing that definitely would be nice would be to be able to combine
> funds from various sponsors for various features. Alone a company can't
> spring for it, but by pooling resources it could get done. This is a lot
> tougher to coordinate and unless there is a complete
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Regarding the secret code stuff - I predict that it will quickly bite
> > whoever does it, unless they are extremely lucky.
>
> Yeah. Bruce and I were worrying about this on the phone today.
> If a company is doing some work with t
I read the hackers list all the time, and have for
years, and my company sponsors PG events every few
months, and I would consider myself fairly "plugged
in" to PG, and this is the first I have seen/heard of
the PostgreSQL Foundation
http://thepostgresqlfoundation.org/
Perhaps a little more prom
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
BTW, why not get rid of src/corba?
Good question; I'll remove it from HEAD tomorrow, barring any objections.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
On Sat, 30 Apr 2005, Nicolai Petri (lists) wrote:
> We also use PostgreSQL as our primary db so it would be more than likely
> that we would donate money for something similar with postgresql if
> either :
> a) we can direct the money at one or more specific tasks
> or
> b) the tasks found
Anyone interested in pooling funds for features should take a look at
http://people.freebsd.org/~phk/funding.html, which is about a FreeBSD
developer who offered to work full-time on developing some specific
features should enough people donate. Also worthy of mention is
http://www.freebsdfoundatio
21 matches
Mail list logo
