Re: [HACKERS] Installation docs wrong?

2005-03-24 Thread Tom Lane
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On this page: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/creating-cluster.html > It has this sequence: > root# mkdir /usr/local/pgsql/data > root# chown postgres /usr/local/pgsql/data > root# su postgres > postgres$ initdb -D /usr/local/

Re: [HACKERS] Patch for collation using ICU

2005-03-24 Thread John Hansen
Useful if it's going to support earlier releases of ICU Not all os's come with ICU3.2, debian for example, currently has 2.1 in testing, and 2.6 in unstable. ... John > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Palle Girgensohn > Sent:

Re: [HACKERS] Installation docs wrong?

2005-03-24 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 12:30:46PM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > root# mkdir /usr/local/pgsql/data > root# chown postgres /usr/local/pgsql/data > root# su postgres > postgres$ initdb -D /usr/local/pgsql/data > > However, initdb will fail in this case, since the /usr/local/pgsql dir > i

Re: [HACKERS] Installation docs wrong?

2005-03-24 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Sorry, on further investigation this seems to work for everyone except that guy - weird. Chris Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: On this page: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/creating-cluster.html It has this sequence: root# mkdir /usr/local/pgsql/data root# chown postgres /usr/local/

[HACKERS] Installation docs wrong?

2005-03-24 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
On this page: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/interactive/creating-cluster.html It has this sequence: root# mkdir /usr/local/pgsql/data root# chown postgres /usr/local/pgsql/data root# su postgres postgres$ initdb -D /usr/local/pgsql/data However, initdb will fail in this case, since the /usr/lo

[HACKERS] Calling Functions from Delete Rule (+ contrib/pgcrypto) = madness ??

2005-03-24 Thread Moran.Michael
Hello there, I have a View with a Delete rule and I would like the Delete rule to call a function (and pass-in a few of the the underlying View's/Table's column values). How do you do this? When I do it, I keep getting the following error: ERROR: function expression in FROM may not refer to ot

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

2005-03-24 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Dave Page wrote: -Original Message- From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 March 2005 18:37 To: Dave Page Cc: Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Dave Page wrote: Not me, b

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

2005-03-24 Thread Tom Lane
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have three pending kerberos patches, two of which are plain bugfixes > and one which I'd argue is a bugfix around a can't-compile issue, that > I'd very much like to see in 8.0.2. Working on these. Don't you have the test backwards here?

[HACKERS] Patch for collation using ICU

2005-03-24 Thread Palle Girgensohn
Hi! I've put together a patch for using IBM's ICU package for collation. If your OS does not have full support for collation ur uppercase/lowercase in multibyte locales, this might be useful. If you are using a multibyte character encoding in your database and want collation, i.e. order by, and

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

2005-03-24 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 March 2005 18:37 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Dave Page wrote: > > > Not me, but bear in

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

2005-03-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Magnus Hagander wrote: > > Now that Tom has gotten the ARC->2Q changes into the 8.0.x Branch, and > > >Josh has had some time to do some preliminary performance > >testing on it, > >we need to put out 8.0.2 ... > > > >Core's hope is to wrap a beta up on Friday (tomorrow), and > >baring any bugs

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

2005-03-24 Thread Magnus Hagander
> Now that Tom has gotten the ARC->2Q changes into the 8.0.x Branch, and >Josh has had some time to do some preliminary performance >testing on it, >we need to put out 8.0.2 ... > >Core's hope is to wrap a beta up on Friday (tomorrow), and >baring any bugs >found in it, do a full release next

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

2005-03-24 Thread Tom Lane
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Dave Page wrote: >> Not me, but bear in mind it's the Easter holidays, so I for one cannot >> guarantee I'll be able to package a windows installer for at least a few >> days. > That's okay, we're only packaging a beta this we

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

2005-03-24 Thread Marc G. Fournier
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Dave Page wrote: Not me, but bear in mind it's the Easter holidays, so I for one cannot guarantee I'll be able to package a windows installer for at least a few days. That's okay, we're only packaging a beta this weekend ... Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

2005-03-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Michael Fuhr wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:35:14PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > > Is anyone sitting on anything that they feel needs/should get into 8.0.2? > > Has anybody had a chance to review the PL/Python patch I submitted? > I did the diff against HEAD but I think its PL/Python

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

2005-03-24 Thread Michael Fuhr
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:35:14PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Is anyone sitting on anything that they feel needs/should get into 8.0.2? Has anybody had a chance to review the PL/Python patch I submitted? I did the diff against HEAD but I think its PL/Python code is identical to REL8_0_STA

Re: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

2005-03-24 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc > G. Fournier > Sent: 24 March 2005 16:35 > To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: [HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release > > > Now that Tom has gotten the ARC->2Q changes into the 8.0.x > Br

[HACKERS] Functions + plpgsql + contrib/pgcrypto = ??

2005-03-24 Thread Moran.Michael
Hello there, What's the preferred and most efficient way to obtain PGCrypto encrypted data from a plpgsql function? 1. Imagine the following simple table: CREATE TABLE crypto ( pid SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, title VARCHAR(50), crypted_content BYTEA ); 2. Now insert the following 3

[HACKERS] Upcoming 8.0.2 Release

2005-03-24 Thread Marc G. Fournier
Now that Tom has gotten the ARC->2Q changes into the 8.0.x Branch, and Josh has had some time to do some preliminary performance testing on it, we need to put out 8.0.2 ... Core's hope is to wrap a beta up on Friday (tomorrow), and baring any bugs found in it, do a full release next Thursday.

Re: [HACKERS] RFC: built-in historical query time profiling

2005-03-24 Thread Bort, Paul
Title: RE: [HACKERS] RFC: built-in historical query time profiling > I see your point.  The ugliness of log-parsing beckons. > Maybe it would make sense to use a separate log server machine, where they could be written to a database without impacting production?

Re: [HACKERS] more detailed timing ?

2005-03-24 Thread Neil Conway
Oleg Bartunov wrote: oh, no. I need 2 numbers only :) What's \timing in psql does ? Or it's just a wrapper to system 'time' ? It computes wall-clock time via gettimeofday(), and is entirely implemented on the client-side. -Neil ---(end of broadcast)

[HACKERS] Postgres recoverey for deleted row of data

2005-03-24 Thread Srinivasa Perumal
hi, is there is way undelete or recover the deleted row in a table in postgres.iam layman, can anyone help me. with regards csperumal __ Switch to Netscape Internet Service. As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.ne