Folks,
Today Michael Steil and I have tested PostgreSQL 7.4.1 on Nintendo Game
Cubes.
All regression test (but stats - stats collector was off instead of on)
have passed successfully.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# uname -a
Linux 192.168.0.47 2.6.3 #20 Wed Mar 3 12:22:07 CET 2004 ppc unknown
unknown
Tom Lane wrote:
I think also that Simon completely misunderstood my intent in saying
that this could be "user-scriptable policy". By that I meant that the
*user* could write the code to behave whichever way he liked. Not that
we were going to go into a mad rush of feature invention and try to
sup
Lee Kindness wrote:
Shridhar, want to discuss this off list a bit to work through the various
options and then revent back to the list with a suitable to-do (for
discussion)?
I don't mind. Just for summary, I am listing the discussion/proposal so far on
this issue..
- Dispose names of connection
Tom Lane wrote:
>Thomas Swan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>
>>>The advantage of symlinks is that an administrator could see how things
>>>are laid out from the command line.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>That's a poor reason to require symlinks. The administrator can jus
On Thursday 04 March 2004 12:04 am, Tom Lane wrote:
> I thought we'd fixed that problem already though. Is there another?
Don't know if it's another, but the problem posted by Cott Lang on 1/17
( http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2004-01/msg00111.php )
has not been resolved. pg_autovacu
"Matthew T. O'Connor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ack is it too late to submit a patch to fix the int overflow
> problem with pg_autovacuum?
No; we're not planning to wrap 7.4.2 till (probably) Sunday. If you can
get the patch in within the next day or so, we can include it.
I thought we'd
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have caught up on my email and am working on the 7.4.2 branding now.
Just as a reminder, before ppl panic ... we are aiming for Monday for a
7.4.2 release ...
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: [EM
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 10:11 pm, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have caught up on my email and am working on the 7.4.2 branding now.
Ack is it too late to submit a patch to fix the int overflow problem with
pg_autovacuum? I'll send a patch to the patches list shortly, hopefully it
will get in
Followup-To: Slony1-general ML
Alex J. Avriette wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:57:28PM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
After some substantial progress on the Slony-I engine development, I'd
like to give a little status report and invite everyone who wants to
participate in this project to join the m
Well, it must have hit the lists if I have put it in the patch queue, no?
---
Hey Bruce,
I never saw the patch hit the hackers list. Did any of you smart folks take a
look at it?
Cheers,
Rob
When grilled further on (Wed,
Hey Bruce,
I never saw the patch hit the hackers list. Did any of you smart folks take a
look at it?
Cheers,
Rob
When grilled further on (Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:58:02 -0500 (EST)),
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confessed:
>
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list
I have caught up on my email and am working on the 7.4.2 branding now.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup.| Newto
Thomas Swan wrote:
> >The advantage of symlinks is that an administrator could see how things
> >are laid out from the command line.
> >
> >
> >
> That's a poor reason to require symlinks. The administrator can just as
> easily open up psql and query pg_tablespace to see that same
> information.
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Greg Stark wrote:
>
>
>>Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Greg Stark wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>I am expecting to hear some bleating about this from people whose
>>preferred platforms don't support symlinks ;-). However, if we don't
>>
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:57:28PM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
> After some substantial progress on the Slony-I engine development, I'd
> like to give a little status report and invite everyone who wants to
> participate in this project to join the mailing list and the development
> team.
Jan, than
"Cyril VELTER" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> so I've modified libpq to handle the case by adding to functions :
> PQexecPreparedPortal(conn,stmtName,portalName,nParams,paramValues,paramlengt
> h,paramFormats,resultFormat,maxrows);
> and
> PQfetchPortal(conn,portalName,maxrows)
> PQe
Simon Riggs wrote:
On the other hand, I was just about to change the wal_debug behaviour to
allow better debugging of PITR features as they're added.
That's a development activity. Enabling the WAL_DEBUG #ifdef by
default during the 7.5 development cycle would be uncontroversial, I
think.
I thin
"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The behaviour I wish to add is:
> Keep wal_debug as a value between 0 and 16.
> If =0 then no debug output (default).
> Use following bitmasks against the value
> Mask 1 = XLOG Checkpoints get logged
> Mask 2 = Archive API calls get logged
> Mask 4 = Tran
Shridhar, want to discuss this off list a bit to work through the various
options and then revent back to the list with a suitable to-do (for
discussion)?
L.
- Original Message -
From: "Shridhar Daithankar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-develo
Simon Riggs wrote:
Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] That should be user-scriptable
policy, in my worldview.
O... and other dbms will freeze when this situation is hit, rather
than continue and drop archive logs.]
Been there, done that, don't see how it's any better. I hesitate to be
real specifi
Simon Riggs wrote:
> User-selectable behaviour? OK. That's how we deal with fsync; I can
> relate to that. That hadn't been part of my thinking because of the
> importance I'd attached to the log files themselves, but I can go with
> that, if that's what was meant.
>
> So, if we had a parameter ca
After some substantial progress on the Slony-I engine development, I'd
like to give a little status report and invite everyone who wants to
participate in this project to join the mailing list and the development
team.
The project homepage is here:
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/slony
> -Original Message-
> From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 12:28 PM
> To: Greg Stark
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] What's left?
>
>
> Greg Stark wrote:
> > imposed no such conditions. If Microsoft wante
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> O... and other dbms will freeze when this situation is hit, rather
>> than continue and drop archive logs.]
> Been there, done that, don't see how it's any better. I hesitate to be
> real specific here, but let's just say the end resul
In the last few days, a number of issues have come up on [HACKERS] and
[PERFORM] that have made important contribs to the PITR topic. Moreover,
work such as tablespaces has sufficient cross-over with PITR to make it
important to double post things, which defeats the object of having a
separate lis
>Neil Conway
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> >>Josh Berkus wrote
> >>
> >>>Simon Riggs wrote
> >>>Please set WAL_DEBUG to 1 so we can see a bit more info: thanks.
> >>
> >>I'm pretty sure that WAL_DEBUG requires a compile-time option.
> >
> > I'm surprised, but you are right, the manual does SAY this requir
>Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>> Maybe specify an archive location (that of course could be on a
> separate
> >>> partition) that the external archiver should check in addition to
the
>
"Merlin Moncure" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Greg Stark wrote:
>> imposed no such conditions. If Microsoft wanted to release a
>> Microsoft Postgresql under a completely proprietary license they
>> would be free
>>to do
>I have often wondered, in a completely off-topic and unproductive sort
>of way
Greg Stark wrote:
> imposed no such conditions. If Microsoft wanted to release a Microsoft
> Postgresql under a completely proprietary license they would be free
to do
I have often wondered, in a completely off-topic and unproductive sort
of way, if exactly that has not already been done by an uns
Greg Stark wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Greg Stark wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I am expecting to hear some bleating about this from people whose
> > > > > preferred platforms don't support symlinks ;-). However, if we don't
> > >
> > > Well, one option would be to have
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> defaulting to the beginning if not found.
> >> Examples: "%T [%P]: " (everybody gets timestamp and pid)
> >> "%T [%P]: [EMAIL PROTECTED](%C:%S %I line:%L %X%T [%P]:" (same
> >> effect
> >> as example under previous point)
> >> - something
Tom Lane wrote:
> Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The reason I posted it because I didn't wanted to work on it if core is not
> > going to accept it on account of non-compliance with spec.
>
> When it comes to ecpg, Michael Meskes is the man you have to convince,
> not any of
Oliver Elphick wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 04:59, Tom Lane wrote:
What might make sense is some sort of marker file in a
tablespace directory that links back to the owning $PGDATA directory.
CREATE TABLESPACE should create this, or reject if it already exists.
It will not be enough for the
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the point is that PostgreSQL is no GNU product, never has been and if someone
> intends to he shall do so after yanking out the contributions I made.
Note that when you released your contributions you did so under a license that
imposed no such conditions.
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Stark wrote:
> >
> > > > I am expecting to hear some bleating about this from people whose
> > > > preferred platforms don't support symlinks ;-). However, if we don't
> >
> > Well, one option would be to have the low level filesystem storage (m
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> with the since 7.4 deprecated copy support functions in libpq, is there
> any define or other way to figure out if compiling against a pre-7.4 or
> post-7.4 libpq?
Hm, don't think so. If you've autoconfiscated your client code, you can
just put in a confi
Tom,
with the since 7.4 deprecated copy support functions in libpq, is there
any define or other way to figure out if compiling against a pre-7.4 or
post-7.4 libpq?
Jan
--
#==#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong
> >To create symlinked directories on Win2k NTFS see:
> > http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/misc.shtml#junction
> >
> >
> >
>
> I don't think we could use this s/w though, unless the author is
> prepared to relicense it. I'm sure implementing a clean room
> version of
> the relevan
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
To create symlinked directories on Win2k NTFS see:
http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/misc.shtml#junction
I don't think we could use this s/w though, unless the author is
prepared to relicense it. I'm sure implementing a clean room version of
the
Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The reason I posted it because I didn't wanted to work on it if core is not
> going to accept it on account of non-compliance with spec.
When it comes to ecpg, Michael Meskes is the man you have to convince,
not any of the core committee.
Oliver Elphick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It will not be enough for the marker to list the path of the parent
> $PGDATA, since that path might get changed by system administration
> action. The marker should contain some sort of unique string which
> would match the same string somewhere in $PG
"Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> My feeling is that we need not support tablespaces on OS's without
>>> symlinks.
> To create symlinked directories on Win2k NTFS see:
> http://www.sysinternals.com/ntw2k/source/misc.shtml#junction
> I think Win2000 or XP would be a
Oh.. By all means..Please do..
The reason I posted it because I didn't wanted to work on it if core is not
going to accept it on account of non-compliance with spec.
Is this fine?
* Allow a 'connection *' pointer to be specified instead of a string to denote
a connection.
I plan to work on it
> > > I just checked from the MinGW console and I see:
> > > [snip]
> > > It accepts ln -s, but does nothing with it.
> >
> > And even if it had worked, it wouldn't really matter, since
> we don't
> > actually want to *run* the system under MinGW/msys, just build it.
> >
> > I think the idea o
Should I add this to the TODO list?
---
Lee Kindness wrote:
> Sort of related, I was thinking about adding some more thread-related
> code such that if a connection wasn't explicitely specified then the
> last connection SET
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I just checked from the MinGW console and I see:
> > [snip]
> > It accepts ln -s, but does nothing with it.
>
> And even if it had worked, it wouldn't really matter, since we don't
> actually want to *run* the system under MinGW/msys, just build
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> My feeling is that we need not support tablespaces on OS's without
> >> symlinks.
>
> > Agreed, but are we going to support non-tablespace installs? I wasn't
> > sure that was an option.
>
> A setup containing o
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 04:59, Tom Lane wrote:
>What might make sense is some sort of marker file in a
> tablespace directory that links back to the owning $PGDATA directory.
> CREATE TABLESPACE should create this, or reject if it already exists.
It will not be enough for the marker to list the
> > > For tablespaces on OS's that don't support it, I think we will have to
> > > store the path name in the file and read it via the backend. Somehow we
> > > should cache those lookups.
> >
> > My feeling is that we need not support tablespaces on OS's without
> > symlinks.
To create symlink
Bruce Momjian said:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> I haven't had any other feedback on this patch that I posted. However,
>> I'm a bit dissatisfied with it for a couple of reasons:
>>
>> . when a connection is logged we don't yet know the user and database,
>> because we haven't processed the init
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I just checked from the MinGW console and I see:
> [snip]
> It accepts ln -s, but does nothing with it.
And even if it had worked, it wouldn't really matter, since we don't
actually want to *run* the system under MinGW/msys, just build it.
I think the idea of implementing
Gavin Sherry wrote:
> I'm going to focus on implementing this on the system(s) I'm used to
> developing on (ie, those which support symlinks). Once that is done, I'll
> talk with the Win32 guys about what, if anything, we can do about getting
> this to work on Win32 (and possibly other non-symlin
Check http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/tsearch/V2/
Oleg
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, [gb2312] к╖цм wrote:
> hi all
> Are there any other docs about tsearch2 except for the 3 docs in
> \contrib\tsearch2\docs
>
> i want some tech docs on tsearch2 thank all---(end
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 03:44, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > I recently had to figure out what was different between the "live" schema
> > and the schema in cvs at work. This was a really painful process, and it
> > occurred to me that it wouldn't be terribly hard to write a perl program
>
54 matches
Mail list logo