scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > scott.marlowe wrote:
> > > On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > >
> > > > scott.marlowe writes:
> > > >
> > > > > If indexes on text worked right in other locales it would be no big deal.
> > > >
> > > > They will
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom,
>
> Hey, I'm looking at the postgresql.conf.sample in CVS, and can't find the
> option that's supposed to let you turn off "Inserting missing FROM clause for
> table ..."
>
> I thought that patch was accepted 3 weeks ago? Is this just missing from
> postgresql.conf.s
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Tom, Justin,
>
> > Um, not documenting it is probably not a good move for us, however putting
> > it at the end in a section marked "Developer Focused" or something similar
> > would probably have the right mix of messages. i.e. "hands off" + "not a
> > performance tweak", et
OK, looks like the lists are up again. I will start applying patches in
9 hours.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup.
Actually I was only looking for cvs, by the time this message made it to
the list, it was working.
Dave
On Mon, 2003-06-09 at 00:21, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:33:03AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > ?? cvs itself has been working for ages now ... anoncvs isn't ..
I've been playing with character encodings and found a problem/bug. I
still use 7.3.2, so it's possible (but I think not) that some of this have
been fixed.
When you run psql with a different language then english the strings are
usually in a character set that is not pure ascii. For example to
re
Folks,
Attached is another order outline for the Postgresql.conf parameters, updated
for 7.4. Please examine it, and then give your opinions on the following:
1) Should "enable_implicit_from" go in the "Version/Platform Compatibility"
section where I have it now, or in "CLIENT CONNECTIONS-Sta
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> If this is broken then it's probably not the only problem --- we rely on
>> sa.sa_family in other places.
> sa.sa_family is not the problem itself, the problem is that if
> you use getaddrinfo with AF_UNSPEC, you can get more than replies
> with more than
On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 10:09:20AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I just saw in the cvs web that you changed freeaddrinfo2 to not
> > have the hint af anymore, and use the one from the struct addrinfo
> > itself.
>
> > This can break things. If you called get
Do you know of anyone working on bi-temporal support for PostgreSQL,
especially native support in PostgreSQL itself? Any comments from
anyone who's looked into or been interested in this in the past?
A while back, some folks pointed out[1] an excellent book[2] by
Snodgrass[3], Developing Time-Ori
Jonathan Gardner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'll admit -- the current state of PQfn is practically unuseable. However, the
> idea is pretty cool. I think it would be nice to have a direct function call
> mechanism that bypasses the parser.
The ability to prepare a "SELECT foo($1, $2, ...)" st
Tom Lane wrote:
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"wal_debug" is seldom used outside of Postgresql source development or unusual
system failures, and should therefore go last.
BTW, it occurs to me that wal_debug is one of the hacker-only variables
that probably ought not be documented at al
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> scott.marlowe wrote:
> > On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > > scott.marlowe writes:
> > >
> > > > If indexes on text worked right in other locales it would be no big deal.
> > >
> > > They will in version 7.4, so all these concerns abo
It's what I tried to use over the weekend, so I could start on a doc patch
... restoring it would probably help a number of people.
andrew
Marc wrote:
>
> ?? cvs itself has been working for ages now ... anoncvs isn't ... or
> is that what you are using?
>
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Dave Cramer wrote
Tom,
Hey, I'm looking at the postgresql.conf.sample in CVS, and can't find the
option that's supposed to let you turn off "Inserting missing FROM clause for
table ..."
I thought that patch was accepted 3 weeks ago? Is this just missing from
postgresql.conf.sample?
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Dat
Tom, Justin,
> Um, not documenting it is probably not a good move for us, however putting
> it at the end in a section marked "Developer Focused" or something similar
> would probably have the right mix of messages. i.e. "hands off" + "not a
> performance tweak", etc.
So, proposal:
1) wal_debug
I just saw in the cvs web that you changed freeaddrinfo2 to not
have the hint af anymore, and use the one from the struct addrinfo
itself.
This can break things. If you called getaddrinfo2() with
AF_UNSPEC, the version from the system can return an AF_UNIX
socket. For instance glibc 2.1 will do
Just interesting if we could inplement some kind of RBAC
(role based access control). Here is the reference:
http://csrc.nist.gov/rbac/
We've used a lot simple (flat) RBAC built on top of postgresql, but
would like to see more powerful (with roles hierarchy) rbac built-in.
Oleg
On Sat, 7
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:33:03AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> ?? cvs itself has been working for ages now ... anoncvs isn't ... or is
> that what you are using?
What else would we be using?
Kurt
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posti
On Sat, 2003-06-07 at 14:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wonder if it's a security problem: One of my customer noticed that he
> could see all databases on the system with phppgadmin. not only he sees
> databases but tables, views, fonctions... Fortunatly he can't see any row.
>
> Th
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just saw in the cvs web that you changed freeaddrinfo2 to not
> have the hint af anymore, and use the one from the struct addrinfo
> itself.
> This can break things. If you called getaddrinfo2() with
> AF_UNSPEC, the version from the system can return a
Tom,
> Bruce hasn't applied that patch yet. I believe he's starting to catch
> up the patch backlog today, though.
>
> BTW there is also a pending patch that will add a GUC variable to
> control "rendezvous" on Darwin. I had forgotten what-all was in the
> patch queue until I looked this mornin
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey, I'm looking at the postgresql.conf.sample in CVS, and can't find the
> option that's supposed to let you turn off "Inserting missing FROM clause for
> table ..."
Bruce hasn't applied that patch yet. I believe he's starting to catch
up the patch back
"Nigel J. Andrews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ok, I tried to try this but I can not get SSL to _not_ be used when
> connecting via any tcp connection, unless the client hasn't been built
> with ssl support of course.
Yeah, I believe that's the way it works. It seems overly fascist of the
SSL c
Just a quick note that we just brought neptune back up and are
re-configuring her (getting the OS updated, patch applied for memory leak,
etc)
Teodor, I have your list of modules and am in the process of getting
postgresql 7.3.3 installed ... will get the mailware DB back up and
configured iwth t
Sure, see the debug_ variables in postgresql.conf or via SHOW ALL, and
then set client_log_messages to DEBUG. Also look at debug_pretty_print.
---
Eric D Nielsen wrote:
> I've gotten back to working on the SQL99 version of
http://archives.postgresql.org is slowly being re-generated from the base
majordomo archive files, and the search index is ... indexing.
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: [EMAIL PROTECTED] secondary:
okay, the developer VM has been moved back to its server ... I've checked
everything I can think of and it all seems to be fine ... mail, ftp all
running ... I'll be working on fixing up the other stuff over the next few
days (ie. anoncvs, archives) ...
---(end of broadc
On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 10:33:03AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> ?? cvs itself has been working for ages now ... anoncvs isn't ... or is
> that what you are using?
I think that'd be it... I'm waiting for CVSup too.
("Cannot connect to cvsup.postgresql.org: Connection refused")
--
Alvaro
Barry Lind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There are a number of reasons that IMHO moving the source out of the
> core project does not make sense for jdbc:
If I'm not misunderstanding here, the problem is that the JDBC sources
in the REL7_3 branch are current (if not, I'd say this is not Lamar's
fa
30 matches
Mail list logo
