On 2003-05-27 21:31:45, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> 'K, I haven't found *that* feature yet ... can you do this on a per-user
> basis as well, or is this a 'blanket, site wide' configuration ...
# When using the 'local:' quarantine method (default), the following
# applies:
#
# A finer control of qu
Michael Brusser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but do you rule out any problems in Postgres code?
Never ... but when you're the only one reporting a problem, a local
issue is something to consider.
> Is there a good explanation to why the same table loaded into another
> Postgres
> installation on
> Hmm. Are you running the database in a non-C locale?
> (pg_controldata would tell you.)
---
Here's the output of pg_controldata:
pg_control version number:72
Catalog version number: 200211021
Database cluster state: in production
pg_control last
Tilo Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Looks like we either change plpython to untrusted status or remove it
>> entirely :-(. Sean, do you have time to prepare a patch for the former?
> Please, don't remove it. We (a group of "trusted" people using Postgresql) are
> actua
Per user or site
I use Spamassassin AFTER the 4 RBL's and a personal fecal Roster.
--On Tuesday, May 27, 2003 21:31:45 -0300 The Hermit Hacker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 27 May 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:
Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite
nice.
> There's been some past speculation about putting in a function call
> nesting depth limit, but I haven't been able to think of any reasonable
> way to estimate a safe limit. The stack size limit varies a lot across
> different platforms, and the amount of stack space consumed per PL
> function c
(Moved to -hackers)
> Rod Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Are you ok with the DB2 and draft-spec syntax of NEXT VALUE FOR (where
> > value is not a reserved word)? Or should I hold onto that until the
> > spec has gone through the final draft / release?
>
> By that time we'll have done the
On Tue, 27 May 2003, scott.marlowe wrote:
> Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite
> nice. It puts all the "borderline" spam in a holding area and sends you a
> daily email with all the topics / names listed and you can request those
> out of the spam bucket. It's
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> >
> > *Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through >300 messages
> > nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and
> > 290 are trash ...
> >
> > What are ppl using
Another vote for SpamAssassin. We use it at work here and it's quite
nice. It puts all the "borderline" spam in a holding area and sends you a
daily email with all the topics / names listed and you can request those
out of the spam bucket. It's configurable to the extreme.
On Tue, 27 May 200
Larry Rosenman wrote:
FEATURE(dnsbl,`korea.services.net',``Mail from $&{client_addr}
rejected by korea.services.net'')dnl
FEATURE(dnsbl,`brazil.blackholes.us',``Mail from $&{client_addr}
rejected by brazil.blackholes.us'')dnl
Yes, SPAM is really a problem here. Unfortunatelly, telco compani
Install SpamAssassin, and let it figure it out for you. It uses a whole list
of RBLs and uses them to score a message as spam, instead of just
blanket-denying messages from those SMTP servers. It works quite well.
On Tuesday 27 May 2003 01:41 pm, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> *Way* off topic ... b
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> *Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through >300 messages
> nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and
> 290 are trash ...
>
> What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned?
Avo
FEATURE(dnsbl,`korea.services.net',``Mail from $&{client_addr} rejected by
korea.services.net'')dnl
FEATURE(dnsbl,`brazil.blackholes.us',``Mail from $&{client_addr} rejected
by brazil.blackholes.us'')dnl
FEATURE(dnsbl,`opm.blitzed.org',``Mail from $&{client_addr} rejected by
opm.blitzed.org'')dn
*Way* off topic ... but I'm tired of processing through >300 messages
nightly of which 10 are stuff that need to be approved for the lists, and
290 are trash ...
What are ppl using / trusting out there as far as Free RBLs are concerned?
---(end of broadcast)--
Are any of these changes ready for CVS for 7.4?
---
Ed L. wrote:
> I've been modifying dbmirror and wanted to offer my changes to anyone that
> cared to experiment, FWIW. My effort is ongoing, the docs aren't perfect,
> I
I am trying to divide the buffer pool into 5 parts and i call these
clusters (different from postgres db clusters). What i want to do is to
make a mapping from the relations to these clusters. One relation belongs
to one cluster and a cluster can obviously have more than one relations. I
use a hash
17 matches
Mail list logo
