[HACKERS] Errors uniquely identified

2003-04-06 Thread A.M.
There doesn't seem to be any way to get error reporting with unique identifiers for each type of error (or warning or notice). Is this something planned for the future? Would this be a daunting task because the various messages are strewn throughout the sources? Would centralized error strings

Re: [HACKERS] psql improvements

2003-04-06 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Mon, Apr 07, 2003 at 11:38:33AM +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > Just wanting some feedback on those psql improvements I put through. > Have people been using psql in CVS? Do you like the new format? Maybe this is counter-feedback: I've been using an ancient version (7.1.3 I think) a

[HACKERS] psql improvements

2003-04-06 Thread Christopher Kings-Lynne
Just wanting some feedback on those psql improvements I put through. Have people been using psql in CVS? Do you like the new format? Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "

[HACKERS] I am away this week

2003-04-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
I will be in Toronto to do training this week, Monday to Friday. I will try to keep up with my email, but I am not sure. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts R

Re: [HACKERS] contrib and licensing

2003-04-06 Thread Kevin Brown
Tom Lane wrote: > Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > But if both of these paragraphs are simultaneously true, then why put > > *anything* in contrib? > > Don't say that too loudly, or Marc may take it upon himself to make it > happen ;-). Well, I hope he's not so eager to do so that he d

Re: [HACKERS] Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch

2003-04-06 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 12:12:57PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I find it so weird, why isn't it just using socketpair() or > > something? > > Checking the HPUX man page for it, I read "socketpair() is supported > only for AF_UNIX", which suggests that it's