Re: [HACKERS] Problems with 7.3.1

2002-12-27 Thread Olivier PRENANT
Tom, I've re-done all tests and I confirm that it works ok on the root disk but not on the others. Ok, this is an old machine but, should I send you a tgz of th pgsql directory if you want to analyse the files? Maybe my strange system triggers an unknown bug? Regards, On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Tom La

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with 7.3.1

2002-12-27 Thread Larry Rosenman
--On Friday, December 27, 2002 18:37:24 +0100 Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Tom Here are some news and tests I did and am still doing: 1) there is no previous installation so that can't be a library problem (good thing!) 2) My tests and compiles are running on data disk ibm 1

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with 7.3.1

2002-12-27 Thread Olivier PRENANT
Hi Tom Here are some news and tests I did and am still doing: 1) there is no previous installation so that can't be a library problem (good thing!) 2) My tests and compiles are running on data disk ibm 18G uw and fail. I ended up intalling on the root disk and installcheck did work ok!! I just

Re: [HACKERS] MOVE strangeness

2002-12-27 Thread Tom Lane
Kevin Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> The cursor must be considered to be positioned on its current row, not >> between rows, or the SQL-defined operations UPDATE WHERE CURRENT OF and >> DELETE WHERE CURRENT OF don't make any sense. (We don't support those >> yet, but we sho

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with 7.3.1

2002-12-27 Thread Tom Lane
Olivier PRENANT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tried postgresql 7.3 and 7.3.1 and they both fail regressin when > creating plpgsql language. However, when installed, createlang plpgsql > template1 work like a charm. Interesting. Would you try another test: now that you've completed the installat

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL article

2002-12-27 Thread Dan Langille
On 27 Dec 2002 at 8:37, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Here's another nice article about PostgreSQL in the enterprise: > > http://linuxworld.com.au/news.php3?nid=2095&tid=1 Those on the advocacy list saw this posted a few days ago: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-advocacy/2002-12/msg00203.php --

Re: [HACKERS] please apply patch to CVS ( 7.3 and 7.4dev)

2002-12-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Applied to 7.3.X and CVS HEAD. Thanks. --- Oleg Bartunov wrote: > Small fix in documentation and some examples of usage. > Please, apply to 7.3 and current CVS > > Regards, > Oleg > _

[HACKERS] PostgreSQL article

2002-12-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Here's another nice article about PostgreSQL in the enterprise: http://linuxworld.com.au/news.php3?nid=2095&tid=1 -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts

Re: [HACKERS] Problems with 7.3.1

2002-12-27 Thread Olivier PRENANT
Tom, I'm puzzled! I tried postgresql 7.3 and 7.3.1 and they both fail regressin when creating plpgsql language. However, when installed, createlang plpgsql template1 work like a charm. Could it be because the machine is slow (and disks too!) Regards, On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > D

Re: [HACKERS] MOVE strangeness

2002-12-27 Thread Kevin Brown
Tom Lane wrote: > The cursor must be considered to be positioned on its current row, not > between rows, or the SQL-defined operations UPDATE WHERE CURRENT OF and > DELETE WHERE CURRENT OF don't make any sense. (We don't support those > yet, but we should someday.) Okay. But then doesn't it make