KobayashiJunichi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I could not execute sample code of plsql.sgml. PostgreSQL version is 7.1.3.
> Then I made patches for reference.
Thanks for the corrections!
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
Brent Verner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for fixing that problem. Out of curiousity, did you put that
> code in the renameatt() function for any reason, or is it just a
> style thing?
Just to avoid closing and reopening the target relation and pg_attribute
relation. Releasing and then
Hello,
I could not execute sample code of plsql.sgml. PostgreSQL version is 7.1.3.
Then I made patches for reference.
1) cs_refresh_one_mv function sample code bug. *** 512,526
2) Singule quotation missing. *** 1152,1158
3) cs_refresh_mviews function sample code bug. *** 1305,1313
On 08 Oct 2001 at 14:43 (-0400), Tom Lane wrote:
| Brent Verner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > wooohoo!!! Of course, it would be best if someone else looked this
| > code over, because I get the feeling there is an easier way to get
| > this done.
|
| No, that's about right, except that you for
- Original Message -
From: Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 08, 2001 7:25 PM
> > > I just thought I would point out that could get
> > > messy and many projects realizing this have created a po directory off the
> > > source tree to store the translations in. I
Serguei Mokhov writes:
> > I just thought I would point out that could get
> > messy and many projects realizing this have created a po directory off the
> > source tree to store the translations in. It might be worthwhile to
> > create such a directory and implement this now then when more and
Hi,
As said in another mail, I have tried to add iso-8859-15 (Latin 9) &
iso-8859-16 (Latin 10) to PostgreSQL, I think I have done mostly all
that's necessary. But I miss two things :
- latin92mic/mic2latin9/latin102mic/mic2latin10 in conv.c
- the leading character value in pg_wchar.h
I don't k
Are we ready for beta on Wednesday? I don't know anything holding us up
at this point. Seems like major work has stopped and everyone is ready
to start testing.
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your
Brent Verner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> wooohoo!!! Of course, it would be best if someone else looked this
> code over, because I get the feeling there is an easier way to get
> this done.
No, that's about right, except that you forgot one step: you shouldn't
try to update column names of fun
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Page
> Sent: 08 October 2001 16:52
> To: 'Tom Lane'; Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Hermit Hacker
> Subject: RE: Daily snapshots hosed (was Re: [pgadmin-hackers]
> [HACKERS] What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION?)
>
> > -Original Message---
"Serguei Mokhov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Kelly Harmon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>9pr7f7$k0j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9pr7f7$k0j$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>> At that point, it seems that your screwed...in that even if you shut down
>> postgres and restart it, somewhere it knows that tha
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 08 October 2001 16:43
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Hermit Hacker
> Subject: Daily snapshots hosed (was Re: [pgadmin-hackers]
> [HACKERS] What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION?)
>
>
> Dave Page <[
Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... I can't find an up-to-date snapshot
> I tried postgresql.rmplc.co.uk and got one (apparently) dated 7 Oct, however
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION didn't seem to be there (it certainly doesn't
> work anyway - syntax error at OR). I then looked in the prima
Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ... I can't find an up-to-date snapshot
Where have you looked? I checked a couple of FTP mirrors at random and
see up-to-date snapshots, eg at ftp://ftp.us.postgresql.org/dev/
ftp://postgresql.wavefire.com/pub/dev/
ftp://postgresql.rmplc.co.uk/pub/postgres
On Friday 05 October 2001 07:48 pm, John Summerfield wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Oct 2001, Lamar Owen wrote:
> I made it clear I was getting frustrated. Read in that context, I think it
> was pretty mild;-)
But it was done in an uninformed way. Had you read the previous two-three
weeks of the archives,
Dear all,
1) CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION
In pgAdmin II, we plan to use the CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION if the patch
is applied. Do you know if there is any chance it be applied for beta time?
We would very much appreciate this feature...
2) PL/pgSQL default support
It is sometimes tricky for Win
> I've made some inroads towards adding 'ignore duplicates'
> functionality to PostgreSQL's COPY command. I've updated the parser
> grammar for COPY FROM to now accept:
>
> COPY [ BINARY ] table [ WITH OIDS ]
> FROM { 'filename' | stdin }
> [ [USING] DELIMITERS 'delimiter' ]
> [ WITH
Guys,
I've made some inroads towards adding 'ignore duplicates'
functionality to PostgreSQL's COPY command. I've updated the parser
grammar for COPY FROM to now accept:
COPY [ BINARY ] table [ WITH OIDS ]
FROM { 'filename' | stdin }
[ [USING] DELIMITERS 'delimiter' ]
[ WITH [NULL AS
18 matches
Mail list logo
