[HACKERS] Now it's my turn...

2001-06-29 Thread Vadim Mikheev
Baby girl on Jun 27. Vadim ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Re: [HACKERS] Configuration of statistical views

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not familiar with the kinds of statistics that are supposed to be > gathered here, but I suppose their usefulness would be greatly increased > if they were gathered across all data/actions, not only the ones that the > users turned them on for. S

Re: [HACKERS] functions returning sets

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Alex Pilosov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I'm on my way to implement what was discussed on list before. > I am doing it the way Karel and Jan suggested: creating a > pg_class/pg_attribute tuple[s] for a function that returns a setof. What? You shouldn't need pg_class entries for function

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgres to Dia UML

2001-06-29 Thread Ing. Roberto Andrade Fonseca
Hi: On 29 Jun 2001, Manuel Sugawara wrote: > Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > So, I wrote a small perl script which outputs XML for Dia to import. > > > Works pretty good. > > > > Thanks for posting a helpful script. > > > > I haven't kept up on perl packages, but I recall

Re: [HACKERS] Configuration of statistical views

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> backend start/stop events probably need to be reported whenever the >> postmaster variable is set, even if all the USERSET variables are off. > I don't consider backend start/stop messages to be critical, > although we get some complaints alrea

Re: [HACKERS] Configuration of statistical views

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> If somebody wants to see an applications querystring (at >> least the first 512 bytes) just in case something goes wrong >> and the client hangs, he'd have to run querystring reporting >> all the time either way. > Agreed. That should be on all

Re: [HACKERS] Configuration of statistical views

2001-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So I can see value in a per database default in pg_database > plus the ability to switch it on/off via statement to analyze > single commands. Do you even need a per-database default? Why not an installation-wide default in postgresql.conf pl