Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace

2001-03-10 Thread Vadim Mikheev
> > Ok, I've made changes in xlog.c and run tests: > > Could you send me your diffs? Sorry, Monday only. Vadim ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Do we still need PowerPC-specifictimestamp_is_current/epoch?

2001-03-10 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> At the end of backend/utils/adt/datetime.c, there is some fairly ugly > code that is conditionally compiled on > > #if defined(linux) && defined(__powerpc__) > > Do we still need this? The standard versions of TIMESTAMP_IS_CURRENT > and TIMESTAMP_IS_EPOCH appear to work just fine on my Powerb

[HACKERS] Do we still need PowerPC-specific timestamp_is_current/epoch?

2001-03-10 Thread Tom Lane
At the end of backend/utils/adt/datetime.c, there is some fairly ugly code that is conditionally compiled on #if defined(linux) && defined(__powerpc__) Do we still need this? The standard versions of TIMESTAMP_IS_CURRENT and TIMESTAMP_IS_EPOCH appear to work just fine on my Powerbook G3 running

Re: [HACKERS] doxygen & PG

2001-03-10 Thread Nymia
The site mentioned was created by me. I used doxygen to create those html files. And it's just the first stab. It doesn't have have doxygen tags yet that's why it looks like that. The reason why I made it was to make it easier for me ( and others as well ) to read the code though. So far, I've le

Re: [HACKERS] doxygen & PG

2001-03-10 Thread Nathan Myers
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 06:29:37PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) writes: > > Is this page > > http://members.fortunecity.com/nymia/postgres/dox/backend/html/ > > common knowledge? > > Interesting, but bizarrely incomplete. (Yeah, we have only ~100 > struct types ..

Re: [HACKERS] doxygen & PG

2001-03-10 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathan Myers) writes: > Is this page > http://members.fortunecity.com/nymia/postgres/dox/backend/html/ > common knowledge? Interesting, but bizarrely incomplete. (Yeah, we have only ~100 struct types ... sure ...) regards, tom lane

[HACKERS] doxygen & PG

2001-03-10 Thread Nathan Myers
Is this page http://members.fortunecity.com/nymia/postgres/dox/backend/html/ common knowledge? It appears to be an automatically-generated cross-reference documentation web site. My impression is that appropriately-marked comments in the code get extracted to the web pages, too, so it is a

Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] WAL does not recover gracefully from ou t-of -dis k-sp ace

2001-03-10 Thread Tom Lane
Denis Perchine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Saturday 10 March 2001 08:41, Tom Lane wrote: >> More numbers, these from a Powerbook G3 laptop running Linux 2.2: > Eeegghhh. Sorry... But where did you get O_DSYNC on Linux? > bits/fcntl.h: # define O_DSYNC O_SYNC Hm, must be. Okay, so

[HACKERS] Re: Interesting failure mode for initdb

2001-03-10 Thread Tom Lane
I said: > That stuff comes out on stdout; all of the interesting stuff is on > stderr. Actually, given the -o option all of the interesting stuff will go to wherever -o says. At this stage of the release cycle I suppose we must resist the temptation to define -o '|command' as doing a popen(), bu

[HACKERS] Re: Interesting failure mode for initdb

2001-03-10 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've removed some of the >/dev/null's and the only undesired output I get > is of this form: > POSTGRES backend interactive interface > $Revision: 1.208 $ $Date: 2001/02/24 02:04:51 $ > backend> backend> > POSTGRES backend interactive interface > $R

[HACKERS] Re: Interesting failure mode for initdb

2001-03-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane writes: > I think one part of the fix is to modify elog() so that a FATAL exit > results in exit status 1, not 0, if not IsUnderPostmaster. Right. > At the very least we should hack initdb so that --debug removes > "-o /dev/null" from PGSQL_OPT, but can you see any way to provide > fil