[HACKERS] PHP and PostgreSQL

2000-12-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have been asked by the major PHP developer Rasmus Lerdorf to see if the PostgreSQL/PHP interface needs any improvements. Is the current PostgreSQL interface module in PHP adequate? Does it support all the current libpq features? If not, would someone submit some patches to the PHP folks. The

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

2000-12-26 Thread Brent Verner
On 26 Dec 2000 at 23:41 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote: | Brent Verner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | Please apply it locally and let me know what you find. | | > what I'm seeing now is much the same. sorry, I sent the previous email w/o the details of the different behavior. Inside ExecEvalFieldSe

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

2000-12-26 Thread Tom Lane
Brent Verner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Please apply it locally and let me know what you find. > what I'm seeing now is much the same. Drat. More to do, then. > i've been in circles trying to figure out where fcinfo->arg is filled. > can you point me toward that? See src/backend/utils/fm

[HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

2000-12-26 Thread Brent Verner
On 26 Dec 2000 at 14:41 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote: | I wrote: | > ... What I'm thinking about doing is setting typmod of | > an entire-tuple function argument to sizeof(Pointer), rather than | > the default -1, to indicate that a pointer representation is being | > used. Comments, hackers? | | Her

Re: [HACKERS] Re: GNU readline and BSD license

2000-12-26 Thread mlw
Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > > (3) Postgres already distributes source, although it does not appear > > that is required. pgsql inc's desire to have a two year closed source, > > they would have to make sure they made available any changes they make > > to GNU source. > > This is a misinterpretati

Re: [HACKERS] Re: GNU readline and BSD license

2000-12-26 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> (3) Postgres already distributes source, although it does not appear > that is required. pgsql inc's desire to have a two year closed source, > they would have to make sure they made available any changes they make > to GNU source. This is a misinterpretation of our intent. As we've said repeat

[HACKERS] Permissions on Stored Procedures

2000-12-26 Thread jmoschet
I've been searching the lists and found a similar question but there have no replies. What I would like to be able to do in Postgres is give users/groups the ability to execute stored procedures on a per procedure basis. I am looking into the Rules system, thinking that this is acheiveable thr

[HACKERS] Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

2000-12-26 Thread Tom Lane
Brent Verner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > more observations WRT sql that blows up postgres on Alpha. > works: > SELECT p.hobbies.equipment.name, p.hobbies.name, p.name > FROM ONLY person p; > breaks: > SELECT p.hobbies.equipment.name, p.hobbies.name, p.name > FROM person p; > SELE