I got early access to the UnixWare 7.1.1b Feature Supplement
UnixWare/OpenServer Development Kit (UDK FS for short).
PostgreSQL 7.0.2 compiles CLEAN (ish...) and we can now support the
C++ stuff.
The 3.2 bug in int8.c is GONE.
Question: Why do we (for UnixWare) force i486 optimization?
A
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> OTOH, support for Windows NT with Cygwin is not "exceptional" compared to
> any other supported system. You run configure; make; make install, with
> GNU make and GCC. The only thing this INSTALL_WIN file does is to tell
> people where to download Cygwin and cgyipc, whic
Kevin O'Gorman writes:
> I'm getting a complaint from pg_ctl that it cannot find
> postmaster.opts.default.
>
> What am I missing?
The postmaster.opts.default file. :-)
Seriously, I'm thinking this check is not necessary, a missing file
should be treated like an empty file. Objections?
--
P
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 04:15:11PM -0700, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> I've just built 7.1 from a slightly old point in the tree:
> October 9. Regression tests pass, but postmaster won't
> start.
>
> I'm getting a complaint from pg_ctl that it cannot find
> postmaster.opts.default.
>
> What am I mis
I've just built 7.1 from a slightly old point in the tree:
October 9. Regression tests pass, but postmaster won't
start.
I'm getting a complaint from pg_ctl that it cannot find
postmaster.opts.default.
What am I missing?
++ kevin
--
Kevin O'Gorman (805) 650-6274 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pe
Tom Lane wrote:
> I'm not sure whether to recommend that you work from current CVS sources
> or not. A couple weeks ago that's what I would have said, but Vadim is
> halfway through integrating WAL changes and I'm not sure how stable the
> tip really is. You could try the tip, and if it blows up
Tom Lane writes:
> Do you have an idea how much it'd bloat the tarball to do that?
current depsincrease
gzipped 7.1 MB 35591 bytes 0.5%
unpacked29MB1309669 bytes 4%
Should be okay...
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL
Ross J. Reedstrom writes:
> For example, no one seems to have commented on the -8% of inline
> comments reported by Peter's c_count! Funny math, indeed.
If you had actually done the math ;-) you would have noticed that the
percentage of the inline comments is negative because those lines have
bo
Robert Kernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > >
> > > I've been unable to follow the directions
> > > in the Programmer's Guide
> > > for getting to the anonymous CVS server.
> > >
> > > I'm running RedHat 6.1, and CVS 1.10 which
>
> What is CVS?
An open-source netw
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> I'm unable to find the complementary function to
>
> ALTER TABLE t ADD FOREIGN KEY(id) REFERENCES pkt(pk);
Currently, ALTER TABLE ... DROP table constraint definition
doesn't exist.
> I would try DROP TRIGGER, but I've also been unable to
> find
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 01:30:25PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I compute the code count with:
>
> find . -name \*.[chyl] | xargs cat| wc -l
Right, that solves the problem others might be seeing, with the command
line getting expanded and silently chopped off. For example, no one
seems to
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >
> > > FYI, it is 376k lines of C code, not bytes.
> >
> > How did you calculate that? I get this using c_count over all .c and .h
> > files:
> >
> > 20903 lines had comments25.4 %
I compute the code count with:
find . -name \*.[chyl] | xargs cat| wc -l
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup.
Thomas Lockhart writes:
> Hmm. It is a fact that M$Windows is not quite the same as *any* of the
> other boxes we support.
> We currently have a section in the printed/html docs covering installing
> on M$ for client-side libraries, and we should move the installation
> instructions for the serv
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > FYI, it is 376k lines of C code, not bytes.
>
> How did you calculate that? I get this using c_count over all .c and .h
> files:
>
> 20903 lines had comments25.4 %
> 6603 comments are inline -8.0 %
> 11911 lines were
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > FYI, it is 376k lines of C code, not bytes.
>
> How did you calculate that? I get this using c_count over all .c and .h
> files:
>
> 20903 lines had comments25.4 %
> 6603 comments are inline -8.0 %
> 11911 lines were blank 14.5 %
>
> Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> >
> > I've been unable to follow the directions
> > in the Programmer's Guide
> > for getting to the anonymous CVS server.
> >
> > I'm running RedHat 6.1, and CVS 1.10 which
What is CVS?
Bob Kernell
Research Scientist
Surface Validation Group
AS&M, Inc.
email: [EMAIL
Bruce Momjian writes:
> FYI, it is 376k lines of C code, not bytes.
How did you calculate that? I get this using c_count over all .c and .h
files:
20903 lines had comments25.4 %
6603 comments are inline -8.0 %
11911 lines were blank 14.5 %
7287 lines for prepro
Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
> I've been unable to follow the directions
> in the Programmer's Guide
> for getting to the anonymous CVS server.
>
> I'm running RedHat 6.1, and CVS 1.10 which
> comes with it. I get as far as entering
> the 'postgresql' password, but it gets
> rejected every time.
>
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> In 7.0.2
>
>select to_char(sum(n),'999') from t1;
>
> causes backend dump a core if n is a float/numeric ...data type AND if
> sum(n) returns NULL. This seems due to a bad null pointer handling for
> aruguments of pass-by-reference data types. I
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> Ah, the build has been failing for at least the last few days due to
> small problems in new content. Since I receive ~700 logs of doc builds
> each year (well, that is the annual rate but I've only stepped up to
> twice daily since ~April), I get slo
I'm unable to find the complementary function to
ALTER TABLE t ADD FOREIGN KEY(id) REFERENCES pkt(pk);
I would try DROP TRIGGER, but I've also been unable to
find a way to name the constraint ;(
the built-in help is both inadequate and inconsistent
8<-8<-8<-8<
Orlandi wrote:
>
> I am user of Microfocus Cobol Netexpress 3.1 and I use
> IDXFORMAT " 4 " for my files.
> I know that I can use the format Btrieve ANSI and to install Btrieve
> in my Linux server with Format : IDXFORMAT " 6 " , and in the
> case of Btrieve I can just recompile the programs, w
In 7.0.2
select to_char(sum(n),'999') from t1;
causes backend dump a core if n is a float/numeric ...data type AND if
sum(n) returns NULL. This seems due to a bad null pointer handling for
aruguments of pass-by-reference data types. I think just a simple
null pointer checking at very top of
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What we could do is ship the dependencies (.deps/*.P) in the tarball.
> That would require running an entire build before making a tarball, but it
> would be a nice service to users.
Hm. It might be handy for people not using gcc, s
> [Not to list]
Back on list; thanks though for protecting me from ridicule ;)
> >For developers (-hackers developers, not application developers using
> >the current release), the "current docs" correspond to the docs built
> >nightly (actually twice a day), which reflect the current developmen
> > Yes, writes are only necessary when "too many dirty pages"
> > are in the buffer pool. Those writes can be done by a page flusher
> > on demand or during checkpoint (don't know if we need checkpoint,
> > but you referred to doing checkpoints).
>
> How else to know from where in log to start
> The point is: this is classic, but noone does it
> like this if your really have a larger hierarchy of
> classes. You'll not get any good performance, when
> solving an association in your oo
> program, because the framework has to query against
> each table: 6 tables - 6 queries !!! :-(((
28 matches
Mail list logo
