Re: [HACKERS] when does CREATE VIEW not create a view?

2000-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
I hate to say this, but this patch fails to apply on our current tree. Can you send me a version that applies? Thanks. > On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 10:12:38AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Oh, the patch strikes me since it is not "multibyte aware." > > O.K. - > Here's the multibyte aw

Re: [HACKERS] backup and restore

2000-10-14 Thread Vadim Mikheev
>> No, 2nd. WAL reflects layout of tuples in data files, so I don't see >> how pg_dump output could be used. >> I'll really appreciate if someone will help with this issue ... after >> alpha testing will start next week. > > Where is this code? How can we get it? Code is in CVS. Philip Warner al

[HACKERS] WAL status & todo

2000-10-14 Thread Vadim Mikheev
Well, hopefully WAL will be ready for alpha testing in a few days. Unfortunately at the moment I have to step side from main stream to implement new file naming, the biggest todo for integration WAL into system. I would really appreciate any help in the following issues (testing can start regardl

Re: AW: [HACKERS] ALTER TABLE DROP COLUMN

2000-10-14 Thread Don Baccus
At 04:23 PM 10/12/00 +0200, Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote: >My conclusion would be that we need both: >1. a fast system table only solution with physical/logical column id >2. a tool that does the cleanup (e.g. vacuum) Oracle provides both styles of "drop column" - the "hide the column's data an