RE: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects

2021-03-08 Thread Tharakan, Robins
> -Original Message- > From: Daniel Gustafsson > Sent: Monday, 8 March 2021 9:42 AM > To: Tharakan, Robins > Cc: pgsql-hack...@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside

Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ million Large Objects

2021-03-08 Thread Tharakan, Robins
Original Message- > From: Peter Eisentraut > Sent: Monday, 8 March 2021 9:25 PM > To: Tharakan, Robins ; pgsql-hack...@postgresql.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [UNVERIFIED SENDER] Re: pg_upgrade failing for 200+ > million Large Objects > > CAUTION: This email originated from ou

RE: Why is parula failing?

2024-03-26 Thread Tharakan, Robins
Hi David / Tom, > David Rowley writes: > It would be good to have log_autovacuum_min_duration = 0 on this machine for > a while. - Have set log_autovacuum_min_duration=0 on parula and a test run came out okay. - Also added REL_16_STABLE to the branches being tested (in case it matters here).

RE: Why is parula failing?

2024-04-01 Thread Tharakan, Robins
> ... in connection with which, I can't help noticing that parula is using a > very old compiler: > > configure: using compiler=gcc (GCC) 7.3.1 20180712 (Red Hat 7.3.1-17) > > From some quick checking around, that would have to be near the beginning of > aarch64 > support in RHEL (Fedora hadn't p

RE: Why is parula failing?

2024-04-01 Thread Tharakan, Robins
> I've now switched to GCC v13.2 and triggered a run. Let's see if the tests > stabilize now. So although HEAD ran fine, but I saw multiple failures (v12, v13, v16) all of which passed on subsequent-tries, of which some were even"signal 6: Aborted". FWIW, I compiled gcc v13.2 (default options)