Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor

2019-09-13 Thread Tattsu Yama
Hi Alvaro! > Hello Tatsuro, > On 2019-Aug-13, Tatsuro Yamada wrote: > > On 2019/08/02 3:43, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > > Hmm, I'm trying this out now and I don't see the index_rebuild_count > > > ever go up. I think it's because the indexes are built using parallel > > > index build ... or maybe

Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor

2019-09-14 Thread Tattsu Yama
Hi Michael! > Attached file is WIP patch.In my patch, I added "command id" to all APIs > of > > progress reporting to isolate commands. Therefore, it doesn't allow to > > cascade updating system views. And my patch is on WIP so it needs > clean-up > > and test. > > I share it anyway. :) > > +

Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor

2019-09-15 Thread Tattsu Yama
Hi Michael, >> > Attached file is WIP patch.In my patch, I added "command id" to all >> APIs of >> > progress reporting to isolate commands. Therefore, it doesn't allow to >> > cascade updating system views. And my patch is on WIP so it needs >> clean-up >> > and test. >> > I share it anyway. :)

Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor

2019-03-24 Thread Tattsu Yama
Hi Robert! >On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 2:47 PM Robert Haas wrote: >> how close you were getting to rewriting the entire heap. This is the >> one thing I found but did not fix; any chance you could make this >> change and update the documentation to match? > > >Hi, is anybody working on this? Thank yo