estriction for the password of a user???
Need some document to make a clarification or suggestion to the user?
BR,
Sean He (iih...@qq.com)
Hi,
Thanks for your information. Even using SCRAM, when specified the
content of "password", still there is a basic request about the length of
it. From the source code, seems there is no restriction, right???
Is it reasonable???
BR,
Sean He
-
Thanks Daniel.
That's a big help to me!
-- Original --
From:
"Daniel Gustafsson"
t this seems like an off by one error?
What do you think? Is this a bug? Is this expected? Is this user error on
our end?
Thanks!
Sean
ger, we could wait
indefinitely (if the parent service has no more incoming transactions,
which means no more WAL to replay).
Are you recommending that we wait until another transaction happens on the
parent DB?
Thanks,
Sean
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 3:59 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi
wrote:
> At
Not sure if this is the right avenue to follow up on this. The patch works
fine. However, we're working on a modified version of the postgres_fdw in
which we're trying to push as much as possible to the remote nodes,
including ordering and limits. The patch causes the upper paths for the
ordering a
ed down to ~8K. We have to read the
entire record in before we can modify half of the page. I suspect eliding
prefaulting FPWs will always be a performance loss for nearly all hardware.
* If there is sufficient interest in these experiences, contact me offline (or
via PostgreSQL Slack) and I