Re: PostgreSQL and Flashback Database

2021-02-12 Thread Philippe Beaudoin
<https://www.dalibo.com/> *DALIBO* *L'expertise PostgreSQL* 43, rue du Faubourg Montmartre 75009 Paris *Philippe Beaudoin* *Consultant Avant-Vente* +33 (0)1 84 72 76 11 +33 (0)7 69 14 67 21 philippe.beaud...@dalibo.com Valorisez vos compétences PostgreSQL, faites-vous certifier par Dalibo <https://certification.dalibo.com/> !

Re: proposal: schema variables

2019-12-22 Thread Philippe BEAUDOIN
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: tested, failed Spec compliant: not tested Documentation:tested, failed Hi Pavel, First of all, I would like to congratulate you for thi

Re: Global temporary tables

2019-12-22 Thread Philippe BEAUDOIN
Hi all, I am not aware enough in the Postgres internals to give advice about the implementation. But my feeling is that there is another big interest for this feature: simplify the Oracle to PostgreSQL migration of applications that use global termporary tables. And this is quite common when s

Re: proposal: schema variables

2019-12-30 Thread Philippe BEAUDOIN
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: tested, passed Spec compliant: not tested Documentation:tested, failed Hi Pavel, I have tested the latest version of your patch. Both i

Adminpack removal

2024-06-26 Thread Philippe BEAUDOIN
Hi, I have just tested PG17 beta1 with the E-Maj solution I maintain. The only issue I found is the removal of the adminpack contrib. In the emaj extension, which is the heart of the solution, and which is written in plpgsql, the code just uses the pg_file_unlink() function to automatically

Re: Adminpack removal

2024-06-28 Thread Philippe BEAUDOIN
Le 27/06/2024 à 10:38, Matthias van de Meent a écrit : On Thu, 27 Jun 2024, 07:34 Philippe BEAUDOIN, wrote: Hi, I have just tested PG17 beta1 with the E-Maj solution I maintain. The only issue I found is the removal of the adminpack contrib. In the emaj extension, which is the heart of the

Re: Adminpack removal

2024-07-08 Thread Philippe BEAUDOIN
Le 01/07/2024 à 10:07, Daniel Gustafsson a écrit : On 28 Jun 2024, at 09:06, Philippe BEAUDOIN wrote: So just looking in public repo covers probably less than 1% of the code. However, this may give a first idea, especialy if a feature use is already detected. Searching for anything on Github