; I did a (slow) dichotomy on gcc sources which determined that gcc r277979
> was the culprit, then I started a bug report which showed that the issue
> was already reported this morning by Martin Liška, including a nice
> example isolated from sources. See:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/
Yes, after the revision I see other failing tests like:
...
select_having... ok 16 ms
subselect... FAILED 92 ms
union... FAILED 77 ms
case ... ok 32 ms
join
Heh, it's me who now breaks postgresql build:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92529
Martin
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 13:01, Fabien COELHO
wrote:
>
>
> > Yes, after the revision I see other failing tests like:
>
> Indeed, I can confirm there are still 18/195 fails with the updated gcc.
Hello.
The issue is resolved now and tests are fine for me.
Martin
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 13:11, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> Heh, it's me who now breaks postgresql build:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92529
>
> Martin
>
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 at 13:
