Hello Robert,
Thank you for your advice. It is very helpful to me.
On 2024/1/16 3:07, Robert Haas wrote:
> Hello Jingxian Li!
>
> I agree with you that this behavior seems surprising. I don't think
> it's quite a bug, more of a limitation. However, I think it would be
>
Hello Robert,
On 2024/2/2 5:05, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 2:16 AM Jingxian Li wrote:
>> According to what you said, I resubmitted a patch which splits the ProcSleep
>> logic into two parts, the former is responsible for inserting self to
>> WaitQu
Hello Robert,
On 2024/2/2 5:05, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 2:16 AM Jingxian Li wrote:
>> According to what you said, I resubmitted a patch which splits the ProcSleep
>> logic into two parts, the former is responsible for inserting self to
>> WaitQu
_ps_display_remove_suffix();
+ if (!dontWait)
+ {
+ /* reset ps display to remove the suffix */
+ set_ps_display_remove_suffix();
+ }
LOCK_PRINT("WaitOnLock: wakeup on lock",
locallock->lock, locallock->tag.mode);
--
Jingxian Li
Hi hackers,
I found a problem when doing the test shown below:
Time
Session A
Session B
T1
postgres=# create table test(a int);
CREATE TABLE
postgres=# insert into test values (1);
INSERT 0 1
T2
Hi Andres, Thanks for your quick reply!
On 2023/11/29 0:51, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2023-11-28 20:52:31 +0800, Jingxian Li wrote:
>> postgres=*# lock table test in exclusive mode ;
>>
>>
>> T4
>>
>> Case 1:
>>
>> postgre
Hi all,
Attached is a patch that fixes bug when calling strncmp function, in
which case the third argument (authmethod - strchr(authmethod, ' '))
may be negative, which is not as expected..
With Regards,
Jingxian Li.
v1-0001-Fix-bug-when-calling-strncmp-in-check_authmethod_v
Hi Daniel，
Thank you for explaining the ins and outs of this problem.
On 2024/4/30 17:14, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> On 30 Apr 2024, at 04:41, Jingxian Li wrote:
>
>> Attached is a patch that fixes bug when calling strncmp function, in
>> which case the third argument
y status. If dontWait = true, this is an
>> * expected case; otherwise, it will open happen if something in the
>> * ipc communication doesn't work correctly.
>>
>> "open" should be "only".
>
> Here's a patch fixing those typos.
Nice catch! The patch looks good to me.
--
Jingxian Li
