Suggestions to overcome 'multixact "members" limit exceeded' in temporary tables

2024-07-31 Thread Jim Vanns
e temporary tables and that may speed up the TRUNCATE but that seems like a hack and I'd rather not do it at all if it's avoidable. Thanks for your help, Jim PS. PG version in use is 15.4 if that matters here -- Jim Vanns Principal Production Engineer Industrial Light & Magic, London

Re: Suggestions to overcome 'multixact "members" limit exceeded' in temporary tables

2024-07-31 Thread Jim Vanns
I've been able to observe that the performance degradation with TRUNCATE appears to happen when other ancillary processes are running that are also heavy users of temporary tables. If I used an exclusive tablespace, would that improve things? Cheers Jim On Wed, 31 Jul 2024 at 15:16, Jim

BitmapOr node not used in plan for ANY/IN but is for sequence of ORs ...

2024-11-13 Thread Jim Vanns
exploited!? Cheers, Jim -- Jim Vanns Principal Production Engineer Industrial Light & Magic, London

Re: BitmapOr node not used in plan for ANY/IN but is for sequence of ORs ...

2024-11-14 Thread Jim Vanns
Thanks Tomas, that's useful to know. Cheers Jim On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 at 13:13, Tomas Vondra wrote: > On 11/13/24 13:08, Jim Vanns wrote: > > (sent to general users mailing list yesterday - but perhaps this is a > > more suitable audience?) > > > > In PG16.4,