Hi,
I am aware of few previous attempts and discussions on this topic
(eventually shelved or didn't materialize):
- https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/45e2a6ae.1080...@oss.ntt.co.jp
-
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BTgmoZgapzekbTqdBrcH8O8Yifi10_nB7uWLB8ajAhGL21M6A%40mail.gmail.com
nhancements to the core functions can be easily accommodated.
Please let me know or comment on this so that we can conclude if this does
look like a reasonable enhancement.
On Sun, Mar 24, 2024 at 9:57 AM Jay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am aware of few previous attempts and discussions on thi
much traction.
- Jay Sudrik
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 1:09 AM Robert Haas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I mentioned in my talk at 2024.pgconf.dev, I think that the biggest
> problem with autovacuum as it exists today is that the cost delay is
> sometimes too low to keep up with the amount of vacuu
