I find a lot of neo-con/trumpian political stances moronic, short-sighted, and
anti-intellectual and therefore consider them offensive, an affront on my way
of life, and a stain on my country.
1) Can I report anyone holding such views and discussing them on a 3rd party
forum?
2) Could I be re
I understand the concern, however, if you look at how attacks happen
> it is frequently through other sites. Specifically under/poorly
> moderated sites. For specific examples, people who have issues with
> people on Quora will frequently go after them on Facebook and Twitter.
>
> these aren't a s
> Now, you may say that (2) would be rejected by the committee, but I would
>> counter that it's still a stain on me and something that will forever
>> appear
>> along side my name in search results and that the amount of time and
>> stress it'd take me to defend myself would make my voluntarily le
> Community is people who joined it
We're not a "community." We're people using email to get help with or
discuss technical aspects of PostgreSQL. The types of discussions that
would normally be held within a "community" would be entirely off-topic
here. We should be professional to each other he
I didn't realize they had replied personally to me.
-- Forwarded message --
From: James Keener
Date: Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct plan
To: Dave Page
If that business is publicly bringing the project into disrepute, or
> harassing other c
> To many of us, we absolutely are a community. Remember, there are people
> here who have been around for 20+ years, of which many have become close
> friends, having started working on PostgreSQL as a hobby. We have always
> seen the project as a community of like-minded technologists, and welcom
Yes. They can. The people who make the majority of the contributions to the
> software can decide what happens, because without them there is no
> software. If you want to spend 20 years of your life
>
So everyone who moderates this group and that will be part of the CoC
committee will have had to
>
> Yes, I believe so. Isn't that what "To that end, we have established this Code
> of Conduct for community interaction and participation in the project’s
> work and the community at large." basically says?
>
No? What's the "community at large"? To me that sounds like "all
interactions" whether
>
> And if you believe strongly that a given statement you may have made is
> not objectionable...you should be willing to defend it in an adjudication
> investigation.
So because someone doesn't like what I say in a venue 100% separate from
postgres, I have to subject myself, and waste my time,
> following a long consultation process
It's not a consultation if any dissenting voice is simply ignored. Don't
sugar-coat or politicize it like this -- it was rammed down everyone's throats.
That is core's right, but don't act as everyone's opinions and concerns were
taken into consideration.
>
> You may dislike the outcome, but it was not ignored.
I can accept that I don't like the outcome, but I can point to maybe a
dozen people in the last
exchange worried about the CoC being used to further political goals, and
the only response
was "well, the CoC Committee will handle it reasona
11 matches
Mail list logo
