On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 06:51:37PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 10:22:50PM +, Finnerty, Jim wrote:
[skipped]
> > with the "double-xmax" representation. This would eliminate a whole
> > class of coding errors and would make the code dealing with 64-bit
> > XIDs simpler
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 09:52:52AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> > I'm not really convinced that ICU is better, either. I think it's more
> > that it isn't used as much.
>
> Well, at least ICU has a notion of attaching versions to collations.
> How mindful they are of bumping the
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 05:11:16PM +0300, Alexander Kuzmenkov wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
> There was some interest in implementing ASOF joins in Postgres, see
> e.g. this prototype patch by Konstantin Knizhnik:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/bc494762-26bd-b100-e1f9-a97901ddad57%40postgre
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 03:44:37PM +0300, Alexander Kuzmenkov wrote:
> On 21.11.2021 07:53, Ilya Anfimov wrote:
> > DISCLAIMER: I am both seeing this first time and I don't have a
> > good understanding of the PosgreSQL development practices.
>
> > pure evil
&g
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:45:41PM +0530, Vigneshk Kvignesh wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I'm migrating our existing PG instances from PG11.4 to PG14.3. I
>have around 5 Million Tables in a single database. When migrating using
>pg_upgrade, its taking 3 hours for the process to comple
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 12:03:53PM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
> Hello
> Do we need new syntax actually? I think that a global unique index can be
> created automatically instead of raising an error "unique constraint on
> partitioned table must include all partitioning columns"
I may suggest
Good day.
I've found that the pg_temp schema alias is mentioned in the
description of the search_path variable, but is missing from
the schemas documentation section.
I think it would be good to have that there, as that section is
mentioned as an extended reference for schemas.
Th
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 10:26:07AM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 6:52???AM Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > If we were starting out today we would probably choose a threaded
> > implementation. But moving to threaded now seems to me like a
> > multi-year-multi-person project with
