Nice repro, thanks!
--
James Hunter, Amazon Web Services (AWS)
On 9/10/20 7:37 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
Against all odds, I was able to reproduce this.
begin;
CREATE TABLE t AS SELECT generate_series(1,99)i;
ALTER TABLE t SET (parallel_workers=2, autovacuum_enabled=off);
CREATE INDEX ON t(i
James
On 9/9/20, 6:14 AM, "Amit Kapila" wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:55 PM Jameson, Hunter 'Jam
seems to be a pretty
simple oversight: in 6 out of 7 cases in _bt_first(), we call
_bt_parallel_done() before returning "false"; but in the 7th case (fixed in
this bug fix), we do not. The fix is to make case #7 the same as the other 6.
James
On 9/9/20, 7:11 AM, "Jameson, Hunter
nts unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:25:03PM +, Jameson, Hunter 'James' wrote:
> Hi, I ran across a small (but annoying) bug in initializing parallel
BTree scans, which causes the parallel-scan state machine to
Answers inline below:
On 9/10/20, 4:58 AM, "Amit Kapila" wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 11:55 PM James
